Evaluation of Dose-dependent Interactions of Antibiotics using RBC Membrane Model Systems

Q3 Chemical Engineering
Selvaraj Stalin, S. Sriharini, S. S. Bharathy
{"title":"Evaluation of Dose-dependent Interactions of Antibiotics using RBC Membrane Model Systems","authors":"Selvaraj Stalin, S. Sriharini, S. S. Bharathy","doi":"10.2174/2405520416666230815124135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe present study aims to understand the membrane interactions of three different antibiotics widely used for non-specific viral diseases.\n\n\n\nThe dose-dependent membrane interactions of the selected antibiotics were elucidated using octanol:water partition coefficient and hemolysis assay\n\n\n\nOur octanol:water partition coefficient experiments indicated that among the three antibiotics (Azithromycin, Erythromycin, and Amoxicillin), azithromycin and erythromycin were more hydrophobic compared to amoxicillin. This finding also correlated with hypotonic hemolysis assay experiments where the membrane stabilization effects of both azithromycin and erythromycin were reduced in a dose-dependent manner compared to amoxicillin.\n\n\n\nThis may be attributed to the hydrophobic nature of azithromycin, and erythromycin penetrates deeper into the RBC membrane to the extent of the hydrophobic core compared to amoxicillin. The result is also concurrent with the observations from the hemolysis assay in the isotonic conditions. To conclude, among the three antibiotics, azithromycin, erythromycin localized on the hydrophobic core of the lipid membrane, and amoxicillin localized on the outer surface and slight penetration to the outer leaflet of the membrane.\n","PeriodicalId":38021,"journal":{"name":"Recent Innovations in Chemical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent Innovations in Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2405520416666230815124135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aims to understand the membrane interactions of three different antibiotics widely used for non-specific viral diseases. The dose-dependent membrane interactions of the selected antibiotics were elucidated using octanol:water partition coefficient and hemolysis assay Our octanol:water partition coefficient experiments indicated that among the three antibiotics (Azithromycin, Erythromycin, and Amoxicillin), azithromycin and erythromycin were more hydrophobic compared to amoxicillin. This finding also correlated with hypotonic hemolysis assay experiments where the membrane stabilization effects of both azithromycin and erythromycin were reduced in a dose-dependent manner compared to amoxicillin. This may be attributed to the hydrophobic nature of azithromycin, and erythromycin penetrates deeper into the RBC membrane to the extent of the hydrophobic core compared to amoxicillin. The result is also concurrent with the observations from the hemolysis assay in the isotonic conditions. To conclude, among the three antibiotics, azithromycin, erythromycin localized on the hydrophobic core of the lipid membrane, and amoxicillin localized on the outer surface and slight penetration to the outer leaflet of the membrane.
用红细胞膜模型系统评价抗生素的剂量依赖性相互作用
本研究旨在了解广泛用于非特异性病毒性疾病的三种不同抗生素的膜相互作用。通过辛醇:水分配系数和溶血测定,阐明了所选抗生素的剂量依赖性膜相互作用。辛醇:水的分配系数实验表明,在三种抗生素(阿奇霉素、红霉素和阿莫西林)中,阿奇霉素和红霉素比阿莫西林更具疏水性。这一发现也与低渗溶血试验相关,在低渗溶血实验中,阿奇霉素和红霉素的膜稳定作用与阿莫西林相比以剂量依赖性的方式降低。这可能归因于阿奇霉素的疏水性,与阿莫西林相比,红霉素更深地渗透到红细胞膜中,达到疏水核心的程度。该结果也与等渗条件下溶血测定的观察结果一致。综上所述,在这三种抗生素中,阿奇霉素、红霉素定位在脂质膜的疏水核心,阿莫西林定位在外表面并轻微渗透到膜的外小叶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Recent Innovations in Chemical Engineering
Recent Innovations in Chemical Engineering Chemical Engineering-Chemical Engineering (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信