The use of mixed methods social network analysis to evaluate healthcare professionals' educator development: an exploratory study.

Charlotte O Callaghan, J. Sandars, Jeremy M. Brown, C. Sherratt
{"title":"The use of mixed methods social network analysis to evaluate healthcare professionals' educator development: an exploratory study.","authors":"Charlotte O Callaghan, J. Sandars, Jeremy M. Brown, C. Sherratt","doi":"10.5455/jcme.20191120122732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Healthcare professionals’ educator development (HPED) is costly, both financially and in terms of clinicians’ time. However, there is little research into how HPED programmes can be evaluated. Research in other educational fields has demonstrated that the analysis of changes in learners’ social networks and the associated changes in social capital can reveal interesting and important effects of educational programmes which would otherwise be unknown. However, research on the social network impact of HPED is minimal. \n \nAims: The authors present an innovative exploratory study of a new evaluation methodology, which considers the social network and social capital of a participant after completion of a HPED programme. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time that such a method has been used in HPED. \n \nMethod: Mixed methods social network analysis (MMSNA) was used to measure and further understand the social capital of the participant after completion of a HPED programme. Data collection was via a self-report template and a semi-structured interview. An exploratory case study of a medical doctor who completed a HPED programme at master’s level was conducted in October 2018 at Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, England. \n \nResults: Relationships made through the HPED programme provided the participant with access to social capital in the form of educational expertise, knowledge and information about job opportunities. These new relationships changed the social network structure, with reduced network constraint and increased number of structural holes in the network of the participant. Such access to resources unavailable to others within the network placed the participant at an ongoing advantage. \n \nConclusion: MMSNA can reveal key benefits of HPED programmes which would not be apparent with other methodologies. The methodology produces results that can be transferred to other HPED programmes.","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20191120122732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare professionals’ educator development (HPED) is costly, both financially and in terms of clinicians’ time. However, there is little research into how HPED programmes can be evaluated. Research in other educational fields has demonstrated that the analysis of changes in learners’ social networks and the associated changes in social capital can reveal interesting and important effects of educational programmes which would otherwise be unknown. However, research on the social network impact of HPED is minimal. Aims: The authors present an innovative exploratory study of a new evaluation methodology, which considers the social network and social capital of a participant after completion of a HPED programme. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time that such a method has been used in HPED. Method: Mixed methods social network analysis (MMSNA) was used to measure and further understand the social capital of the participant after completion of a HPED programme. Data collection was via a self-report template and a semi-structured interview. An exploratory case study of a medical doctor who completed a HPED programme at master’s level was conducted in October 2018 at Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, England. Results: Relationships made through the HPED programme provided the participant with access to social capital in the form of educational expertise, knowledge and information about job opportunities. These new relationships changed the social network structure, with reduced network constraint and increased number of structural holes in the network of the participant. Such access to resources unavailable to others within the network placed the participant at an ongoing advantage. Conclusion: MMSNA can reveal key benefits of HPED programmes which would not be apparent with other methodologies. The methodology produces results that can be transferred to other HPED programmes.
运用混合方法、社会网络分析评估医疗专业人员教育发展:一项探索性研究。
卫生保健专业人员的教育发展(HPED)是昂贵的,无论是在财政和临床医生的时间方面。然而,很少有关于如何评估HPED项目的研究。其他教育领域的研究表明,对学习者社会网络的变化和相关的社会资本变化的分析可以揭示教育计划的有趣和重要的影响,否则这些影响是未知的。然而,关于HPED对社会网络影响的研究很少。目的:作者提出了一种新的评估方法的创新探索性研究,该方法考虑了完成HPED计划后参与者的社会网络和社会资本。据作者所知,这是第一次在HPED中使用这种方法。方法:采用混合方法社会网络分析(MMSNA)来测量和进一步了解参与者在HPED计划完成后的社会资本。数据收集通过自我报告模板和半结构化访谈。2018年10月,英国奥姆斯科克边山大学对一名完成HPED硕士课程的医生进行了一项探索性案例研究。结果:通过HPED计划建立的关系为参与者提供了以教育专长、知识和就业机会信息形式获得社会资本的途径。这些新的关系改变了社会网络结构,减少了网络约束,增加了参与者网络中的结构漏洞。这种对网络内其他人无法获得的资源的访问使参与者处于持续的优势地位。结论:MMSNA可以揭示HPED规划的关键好处,而其他方法无法明显地显示这些好处。该方法产生的结果可以转移到其他HPED规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信