Chronic wound care utilization among Veterans using VHA and Medicare

Q1 Medicine
Erin D. Bouldin , Edwin S. Wong , Chuan-Fen Liu , Alyson J. Littman , Leslie L. Taylor , Kenneth Rice , Gayle E. Reiber
{"title":"Chronic wound care utilization among Veterans using VHA and Medicare","authors":"Erin D. Bouldin ,&nbsp;Edwin S. Wong ,&nbsp;Chuan-Fen Liu ,&nbsp;Alyson J. Littman ,&nbsp;Leslie L. Taylor ,&nbsp;Kenneth Rice ,&nbsp;Gayle E. Reiber","doi":"10.1016/j.wndm.2017.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Veterans who use the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) also may use Medicare coverage for treatment outside VHA. Using multiple </span>health care systems introduces fragmentation and may increase utilization. The purpose of this study was to compare chronic wound care utilization among VHA-Medicare dual system users and VHA-exclusive users.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using data from VHA chart review and Medicare claims, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 203 Medicare-enrolled VHA users with an incident, chronic lower limb wound between October 1, 2006 and September 30, 2007 and followed them for up to one year. We identified all VHA and Medicare wound-care visits during the wound episode.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>19.7% of the cohort was dual users. Dual users had higher observed wound care utilization than VHA-exclusive users (11.9 versus 7.6 outpatient visits [p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002] and 1.6 versus 0.7 inpatient stays [p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0008]). After adjusting for covariates including wound duration, dual users were predicted to have 8.6 outpatient wound care visits and 1.1 inpatient wound care stays while VHA-exclusive users were predicted to have 7.0 (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.07) outpatient visits and 0.7 (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.05) inpatient stays.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Dual use contributes to higher wound care utilization potentially because of longer wound duration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38278,"journal":{"name":"Wound Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"Pages 1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wndm.2017.01.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213909516300362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Veterans who use the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) also may use Medicare coverage for treatment outside VHA. Using multiple health care systems introduces fragmentation and may increase utilization. The purpose of this study was to compare chronic wound care utilization among VHA-Medicare dual system users and VHA-exclusive users.

Methods

Using data from VHA chart review and Medicare claims, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 203 Medicare-enrolled VHA users with an incident, chronic lower limb wound between October 1, 2006 and September 30, 2007 and followed them for up to one year. We identified all VHA and Medicare wound-care visits during the wound episode.

Results

19.7% of the cohort was dual users. Dual users had higher observed wound care utilization than VHA-exclusive users (11.9 versus 7.6 outpatient visits [p = 0.002] and 1.6 versus 0.7 inpatient stays [p = 0.0008]). After adjusting for covariates including wound duration, dual users were predicted to have 8.6 outpatient wound care visits and 1.1 inpatient wound care stays while VHA-exclusive users were predicted to have 7.0 (p = 0.07) outpatient visits and 0.7 (p = 0.05) inpatient stays.

Conclusions

Dual use contributes to higher wound care utilization potentially because of longer wound duration.

退伍军人使用VHA和医疗保险的慢性伤口护理利用率
使用退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)的退伍军人也可以使用医疗保险覆盖VHA以外的治疗。使用多个卫生保健系统会导致碎片化,并可能提高利用率。本研究的目的是比较VHA-Medicare双重系统使用者和vha专属使用者的慢性伤口护理使用情况。方法利用VHA图表回顾和医疗保险索赔的数据,我们对2006年10月1日至2007年9月30日期间发生意外慢性下肢伤口的203名医疗保险登记的VHA用户进行了回顾性队列研究,并对他们进行了长达一年的随访。结果:19.7%的队列患者是双重使用者。双重使用者观察到的伤口护理利用率高于纯vha使用者(11.9对7.6门诊人次[p = 0.002], 1.6对0.7住院人次[p = 0.0008])。在调整包括伤口持续时间在内的协变量后,双重使用者预计有8.6次门诊伤口护理就诊和1.1次住院伤口护理住院,而vha专属使用者预计有7.0次门诊就诊(p = 0.07)和0.7次住院(p = 0.05)。结论双重使用可延长创面持续时间,提高创面护理利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wound Medicine
Wound Medicine Medicine-Surgery
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信