The effect of COVID-19 lockdown on the epidemiology of maxillofacial trauma at tertiary health facilities in Pretoria

N. Khan, T. Madiba, Buntu Xoki, Wenzile Mjoli, Thendo Nevhutalu
{"title":"The effect of COVID-19 lockdown on the epidemiology of maxillofacial trauma at tertiary health facilities in Pretoria","authors":"N. Khan, T. Madiba, Buntu Xoki, Wenzile Mjoli, Thendo Nevhutalu","doi":"10.17159/sadj.v78i04.15054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: COVID-19 restrictions have reduced the number of consultations of patients including Maxillo-facial trauma patients. \nAim: To analyse and compare the epidemiology of maxillofacial trauma during four months of the lockdown period and compare it with the same months from the previous year (2019 and 2020). \nMaterials and Method: A retrospective record-based study was conducted with data drawn from all maxillofacial trauma patients who presented in the maxillofacial and oral surgery unit, of the University of Pretoria (UP) and Steve Biko Academic Hospital (SBAH) from April to July of 2019 and April to July of 2020. Data collected included age, gender, aetiology of injury, site of injury, severity and extent of injury, fracture pattern and site, waiting period for treatment and month of injury. Chi-square test was used to evaluate the association between variables. The level of significant was set at p ≤ 0.05. \nResults: A total of 197 patients were seen in the two institutions with maxillofacial injuries for the years 2019 and 2020 with ages ranging from 1 to 81 years and a mean of 36.24. Most patients were males 167(85%). Many patients were seen in 2019 at 139(71%). There was no association between the fracture site and the aetiology. The mandible was significantly the most common site of injury and more conservative treatment was done as compared to other forms of treatment (p < 0.05). \nConclusion: More Maxillofacial cases were seen in 2019 than in 2020 with more males as compared to females. The majority of injuries were assaults followed by motor vehicle accidents (MVA). The mandible was the common site of injury. More conservative treatment was done compared to other forms of treatment.","PeriodicalId":79721,"journal":{"name":"SADJ : journal of the South African Dental Association = tydskrif van die Suid-Afrikaanse Tandheelkundige Vereniging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SADJ : journal of the South African Dental Association = tydskrif van die Suid-Afrikaanse Tandheelkundige Vereniging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v78i04.15054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 restrictions have reduced the number of consultations of patients including Maxillo-facial trauma patients. Aim: To analyse and compare the epidemiology of maxillofacial trauma during four months of the lockdown period and compare it with the same months from the previous year (2019 and 2020). Materials and Method: A retrospective record-based study was conducted with data drawn from all maxillofacial trauma patients who presented in the maxillofacial and oral surgery unit, of the University of Pretoria (UP) and Steve Biko Academic Hospital (SBAH) from April to July of 2019 and April to July of 2020. Data collected included age, gender, aetiology of injury, site of injury, severity and extent of injury, fracture pattern and site, waiting period for treatment and month of injury. Chi-square test was used to evaluate the association between variables. The level of significant was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: A total of 197 patients were seen in the two institutions with maxillofacial injuries for the years 2019 and 2020 with ages ranging from 1 to 81 years and a mean of 36.24. Most patients were males 167(85%). Many patients were seen in 2019 at 139(71%). There was no association between the fracture site and the aetiology. The mandible was significantly the most common site of injury and more conservative treatment was done as compared to other forms of treatment (p < 0.05). Conclusion: More Maxillofacial cases were seen in 2019 than in 2020 with more males as compared to females. The majority of injuries were assaults followed by motor vehicle accidents (MVA). The mandible was the common site of injury. More conservative treatment was done compared to other forms of treatment.
新冠肺炎封锁对比勒陀利亚三级卫生机构颌面部创伤流行病学的影响
背景:新冠肺炎限制措施减少了包括颌面部创伤患者在内的患者咨询次数。目的:分析和比较封锁期四个月内颌面部创伤的流行病学,并与前一年(2019年和2020年)同期进行比较。材料和方法:根据2019年4月至7月和2020年4月到7月在比勒陀利亚大学(UP)和Steve Biko学术医院(SBAH)颌面和口腔外科就诊的所有颌面创伤患者的数据,进行了一项基于记录的回顾性研究。收集的数据包括年龄、性别、损伤病因、损伤部位、损伤的严重程度和程度、骨折模式和部位、等待治疗的时间和损伤月份。卡方检验用于评估变量之间的相关性。显著性水平设定为p≤0.05。结果:2019年和2020年,这两个机构共有197名颌面损伤患者,年龄从1岁到81岁不等,平均36.24岁。大多数患者为男性167人(85%)。2019年,许多患者就诊人数为139人(71%)。骨折部位和病因之间没有关联。下颌骨是最常见的损伤部位,与其他形式的治疗相比,进行了更保守的治疗(p<0.05)。结论:2019年的颌面部病例比2020年多,男性比女性多。受伤的大多数是袭击,其次是机动车事故。下颌骨是常见的损伤部位。与其他形式的治疗相比,进行了更为保守的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信