Resuscitative Thoracotomy and Aortic Cross-Clamp and Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta

IF 0.2 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
F. Nagashima, T. Irahara, K. Ishida, Takaaki Maruhashi, Y. Matsumura
{"title":"Resuscitative Thoracotomy and Aortic Cross-Clamp and Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta","authors":"F. Nagashima, T. Irahara, K. Ishida, Takaaki Maruhashi, Y. Matsumura","doi":"10.26676/jevtm.v6i1.234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are three methods of aortic occlusion; RTACC (resuscitative thoracotomy with aortic cross-clamp), abdominal aortic compression/occlusion after laparotomy, and REBOA. It is essential to understand the characteristics of each methods and use them appropriately according to the situation or in combination. RTACC is characterized by its rapidity and certainty, but highly invasive. Abdominal aortic compression/occlusion is beneficial because hemostasis after laparotomy can be performed simultaneusly. Advantages of REBOA compared to RTACC are minimaly-invasiveness and safety, and disadvantages are rapidity and certainty. However, it is not necessary to discuss the superiority or inferiority of RTACC and REBOA. The appropriate determination of a combination of these tactics will increase the range of strategies. In particular, RTACC should be performed promptly for impending cardiac arrest and early conversion to REBOA can be helpful regarding to prevention of hypothermia and reduction of chest wall bleeding (To \"REBOA & RTACC\" instead of \"REBOA vs RTACC\").","PeriodicalId":41233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26676/jevtm.v6i1.234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are three methods of aortic occlusion; RTACC (resuscitative thoracotomy with aortic cross-clamp), abdominal aortic compression/occlusion after laparotomy, and REBOA. It is essential to understand the characteristics of each methods and use them appropriately according to the situation or in combination. RTACC is characterized by its rapidity and certainty, but highly invasive. Abdominal aortic compression/occlusion is beneficial because hemostasis after laparotomy can be performed simultaneusly. Advantages of REBOA compared to RTACC are minimaly-invasiveness and safety, and disadvantages are rapidity and certainty. However, it is not necessary to discuss the superiority or inferiority of RTACC and REBOA. The appropriate determination of a combination of these tactics will increase the range of strategies. In particular, RTACC should be performed promptly for impending cardiac arrest and early conversion to REBOA can be helpful regarding to prevention of hypothermia and reduction of chest wall bleeding (To "REBOA & RTACC" instead of "REBOA vs RTACC").
复苏式开胸主动脉交叉夹术和复苏式血管内球囊主动脉闭塞术
主动脉阻塞有三种方法;RTACC(主动脉交叉夹复苏开胸术),剖腹手术后腹主动脉压迫/闭塞,REBOA。必须了解每种方法的特点,并根据情况或结合使用适当地使用它们。RTACC具有快速、确定的特点,但具有较高的侵入性。腹主动脉压迫/闭塞是有益的,因为剖腹手术后的止血可以同时进行。与RTACC相比,REBOA的优点是微创性和安全性,缺点是快速和确定性。然而,没有必要讨论RTACC和REBOA的优劣。适当地确定这些战术的组合将增加战略的范围。特别是,对于即将发生的心脏骤停,应及时进行RTACC,并且早期转换为REBOA有助于预防体温过低和减少胸壁出血(改为“REBOA和RTACC”,而不是“REBOA与RTACC”)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信