Experimental study on open-end correction of a Helmholtz resonator narrow slit neck

IF 0.3 4区 工程技术 Q4 ACOUSTICS
S. Sakamoto, Y. Akiba, R. Iizuka, Shunsuke Watanabe, R. Kominami, Tetsushi Shintani
{"title":"Experimental study on open-end correction of a Helmholtz resonator narrow slit neck","authors":"S. Sakamoto, Y. Akiba, R. Iizuka, Shunsuke Watanabe, R. Kominami, Tetsushi Shintani","doi":"10.3397/1/377011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In general, the acoustic effective length of the open end of an air column is longer than its geometric length. Here, the effective increment of the geometric length of an air column is called the open-end correction length, which is an acoustically crucial issue. The purpose of this\n study is to experimentally clarify the open-end correction length for a slit shape with a narrow clearance. For this reason, the sound absorption coefficient was measured using a sample in which the neck of the Helmholtz resonator was shaped as a slit with a narrow clearance. Next, the open-end\n correction length (i.e., mass end correction length and resistive end correction length) was calculated backward by comparing the experimental and theoretical sound absorption curves. The resistive end correction increased as the slit width became narrower within the range of 0.5 mm or less\n for both the center slit and the slit near the wall, indicating a significant discrepancy between the theoretical equation and the estimated value. For the mass end correction, in the case the center slit, the estimated value is close to the theoretical value of in the slit width range from\n 0.3 mm to 1.0 mm. The results of this study may be useful in eliminating discrepancies in correction values for open-end correction in slits with narrow clearance.","PeriodicalId":49748,"journal":{"name":"Noise Control Engineering Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noise Control Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3397/1/377011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In general, the acoustic effective length of the open end of an air column is longer than its geometric length. Here, the effective increment of the geometric length of an air column is called the open-end correction length, which is an acoustically crucial issue. The purpose of this study is to experimentally clarify the open-end correction length for a slit shape with a narrow clearance. For this reason, the sound absorption coefficient was measured using a sample in which the neck of the Helmholtz resonator was shaped as a slit with a narrow clearance. Next, the open-end correction length (i.e., mass end correction length and resistive end correction length) was calculated backward by comparing the experimental and theoretical sound absorption curves. The resistive end correction increased as the slit width became narrower within the range of 0.5 mm or less for both the center slit and the slit near the wall, indicating a significant discrepancy between the theoretical equation and the estimated value. For the mass end correction, in the case the center slit, the estimated value is close to the theoretical value of in the slit width range from 0.3 mm to 1.0 mm. The results of this study may be useful in eliminating discrepancies in correction values for open-end correction in slits with narrow clearance.
亥姆霍兹谐振腔窄缝颈开口校正的实验研究
一般情况下,气柱开口端的声有效长度大于其几何长度。这里,气柱几何长度的有效增量称为开口修正长度,这是声学上的一个关键问题。本研究的目的是通过实验澄清狭缝形状具有狭窄间隙的开口端校正长度。因此,测量吸声系数的方法是将亥姆霍兹谐振器的颈部做成狭缝状。然后,通过对比实验和理论吸声曲线,反向计算出开口端修正长度(即质量端修正长度和电阻端修正长度)。随着狭缝宽度的变窄,中心狭缝和近壁面狭缝的电阻端修正量在0.5 mm或更小的范围内增大,表明理论方程与估计值存在显著差异。对于质量端修正,在中心狭缝情况下,在0.3 ~ 1.0 mm狭缝宽度范围内,估计值接近理论值。本研究的结果可能有助于消除狭缝开口端矫正时修正值的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Noise Control Engineering Journal
Noise Control Engineering Journal 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCEJ is the pre-eminent academic journal of noise control. It is the International Journal of the Institute of Noise Control Engineering of the USA. It is also produced with the participation and assistance of the Korean Society of Noise and Vibration Engineering (KSNVE). NCEJ reaches noise control professionals around the world, covering over 50 national noise control societies and institutes. INCE encourages you to submit your next paper to NCEJ. Choosing NCEJ: Provides the opportunity to reach a global audience of NCE professionals, academics, and students; Enhances the prestige of your work; Validates your work by formal peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信