The Different Rights of a ‘Worker’: A Comparative View

IF 0.8 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
E. Kovács
{"title":"The Different Rights of a ‘Worker’: A Comparative View","authors":"E. Kovács","doi":"10.54648/ijcl2023009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The academic debate on the protection of vulnerable persons performing work is often driven by the idea that a person’s status in labour law determines the rights they are entitled to. This approach overlooks the fact that the personal scope of labour rights is heterogeneous across EU Member States, with different groups enjoying the right to equal treatment, protection against unfair dismissal or the right to a minimum wage. The status of employee or worker does not necessarily confer a wide range of rights. This short article provides an overview of the different systems in terms of the consequences of this status. While highlighting this diversity in the personal scope of workers’ rights, it is argued that regulations that focus less on the relationship between the employer and the worker, and more on the impact of a regime on the public, provide more appropriate protection for persons who do not fit into the traditional employment relationship.\nPlatform Worker, Definition of Worker, Personal Scope of Labour Rights, Labour Regulation Models","PeriodicalId":44213,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ijcl2023009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The academic debate on the protection of vulnerable persons performing work is often driven by the idea that a person’s status in labour law determines the rights they are entitled to. This approach overlooks the fact that the personal scope of labour rights is heterogeneous across EU Member States, with different groups enjoying the right to equal treatment, protection against unfair dismissal or the right to a minimum wage. The status of employee or worker does not necessarily confer a wide range of rights. This short article provides an overview of the different systems in terms of the consequences of this status. While highlighting this diversity in the personal scope of workers’ rights, it is argued that regulations that focus less on the relationship between the employer and the worker, and more on the impact of a regime on the public, provide more appropriate protection for persons who do not fit into the traditional employment relationship. Platform Worker, Definition of Worker, Personal Scope of Labour Rights, Labour Regulation Models
“工人”的不同权利:比较观点
关于保护从事工作的弱势群体的学术辩论往往是基于这样一种观点,即一个人在劳动法中的地位决定了他们有权享有的权利,防止不公平解雇或获得最低工资的权利。雇员或工人的身份不一定赋予广泛的权利。这篇短文概述了不同制度对这种状况的影响。虽然强调了工人权利个人范围的多样性,但有人认为,较少关注雇主和工人之间关系,而更多关注制度对公众的影响的法规,为不符合传统就业关系的人提供了更适当的保护。平台工人、工人定义、个人劳动权利范围、劳动监管模式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Published four times a year, the International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations is an essential source of information and analysis for labour lawyers, academics, judges, policymakers and others. The Journal publishes original articles in the domains of labour law (broadly understood) and industrial relations. Articles cover comparative and international (or regional) analysis of topical issues, major developments and innovative practices, as well as discussions of theoretical and methodological approaches. The Journal adopts a double-blind peer review process. A distinguished editorial team, with the support of an International Advisory Board of eminent scholars from around the world, ensures a continuing high standard of scientific research dealing with a range of important issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信