Reconsidering the John of Revelation

IF 0.4 4区哲学 0 RELIGION

Novum Testamentum Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI:10.1163/15685365-bja10001

John-Christian Eurell

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The historical context of the Revelation of John is a much-debated issue. This article discusses the most popular theories concerning the dating and authorship of Revelation and finds them wanting. Rather than being a composition of an otherwise unknown prophet named John in the late first century, it is argued that Revelation should be regarded as one of many pseudonymous apocalypses that are composed in the early second century.

查看原文本刊更多论文

反思启示录中的约翰

《约翰启示录》的历史背景是一个备受争议的问题。这篇文章讨论了关于《启示录》的年代和作者的最流行的理论，并发现它们是不足的。与其说《启示录》是一世纪末一位名不见经传的先知约翰的作品，不如说它应该被视为二世纪初创作的许多假名启示录之一。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Novum Testamentum RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Novum Testamentum is a leading international journal devoted to the study of the New Testament and related subjects. This includes text-critical, philological, and exegetical studies, and investigations which seek to situate early Christian texts (both canonical and non-canonical) and theology in the broader context of Jewish and Graeco-Roman history, culture, religion, and literature. ● For 50 years an unrivalled resource for the subject. ● Articles in English, French and German. ● Extensive Book Review section in each volume, introducing the reader to a large section of related titles.