Congestive heart failure and sepsis: a retrospective study of hospitalization outcomes from a rural hospital in Southwest Missouri

Alexandra Skovran, Mason B Hinke, S. N. Sloan, Greg Stahl, Kerry Johnson, S. Goade, R. Arnce
{"title":"Congestive heart failure and sepsis: a retrospective study of hospitalization outcomes from a rural hospital in Southwest Missouri","authors":"Alexandra Skovran, Mason B Hinke, S. N. Sloan, Greg Stahl, Kerry Johnson, S. Goade, R. Arnce","doi":"10.1097/EC9.0000000000000033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Sepsis is the leading cause of death in hospitalized patients and significant effort has been made to facilitate early diagnosis and management. However, aggressive treatment can have negative effects, especially in patients with unstable volume status, such as those with congestive heart failure. Methods We used electronic medical records to perform a retrospective study looking at hospital outcomes in patients from Southwest Missouri who were admitted with sepsis and had a comorbid diagnosis of hypertensive heart failure. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results We studied a total of 184 patients with the diagnosis of hypertensive heart failure with sepsis, and 348 patients with the diagnosis of sepsis that served as the baseline group. There was a total of 37 (20%) deaths in the hypertensive heart failure group and a total of 94 (27%) deaths in the baseline group. Conclusion Our study showed no significant difference between the baseline group and those with hypertensive heart disease with heart failure.","PeriodicalId":72895,"journal":{"name":"Emergency and critical care medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":"105 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EC9.0000000000000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Sepsis is the leading cause of death in hospitalized patients and significant effort has been made to facilitate early diagnosis and management. However, aggressive treatment can have negative effects, especially in patients with unstable volume status, such as those with congestive heart failure. Methods We used electronic medical records to perform a retrospective study looking at hospital outcomes in patients from Southwest Missouri who were admitted with sepsis and had a comorbid diagnosis of hypertensive heart failure. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results We studied a total of 184 patients with the diagnosis of hypertensive heart failure with sepsis, and 348 patients with the diagnosis of sepsis that served as the baseline group. There was a total of 37 (20%) deaths in the hypertensive heart failure group and a total of 94 (27%) deaths in the baseline group. Conclusion Our study showed no significant difference between the baseline group and those with hypertensive heart disease with heart failure.
充血性心力衰竭和败血症:密苏里州西南部一家农村医院住院结果的回顾性研究
摘要背景脓毒症是住院患者死亡的主要原因,为促进早期诊断和管理已做出了重大努力。然而,积极的治疗可能会产生负面影响,尤其是对容量不稳定的患者,如充血性心力衰竭患者。方法我们使用电子医疗记录进行了一项回顾性研究,观察密苏里州西南部因败血症入院并被诊断为高血压心力衰竭的患者的住院结果。我们的主要结果是住院死亡率。结果我们共研究了184例诊断为高血压心力衰竭伴败血症的患者,以及348例诊断为败血症的患者作为基线组。高血压心力衰竭组共有37人(20%)死亡,基线组共有94人(27%)死亡。结论我们的研究表明,基线组与高血压性心脏病合并心力衰竭组之间没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信