‘That Path Where Flowers Never Grew’: Pageantry as Fertility Going Awry in ‘The Triumph of Life’

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 POETRY
Pauline Hortolland
{"title":"‘That Path Where Flowers Never Grew’: Pageantry as Fertility Going Awry in ‘The Triumph of Life’","authors":"Pauline Hortolland","doi":"10.1080/09524142.2022.2151202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this essay, I use the notion of fertility to examine what is left of Erasmus Darwin’s influence on Percy Shelley in his last, unfinished poem, ‘The Triumph of Life’. My aim is to shed light on Shelley’s use of pageantry in this poem in a new way, bearing in mind Darwin’s frequent use of botanical pageants in The Loves of the Plants and in The Temple of Nature, that is, poems which notoriously influenced Shelley in Queen Mab and Prometheus Unbound. Shelley’s pageant in ‘The Triumph of Life’ is the enactment of the ‘mutiny within’ (l. 213), which is opposed to the dominion of love in Prometheus Unbound and to Darwin’s idea that good outbalances evil (The Temple of Nature, IV, 135–45). While on the surface Shelley ironically reverses the positive connotations of fertility which characterize the Darwinian botanical pageant, he nonetheless preserves this fertility metaphorically, resorting to the pageant as a metaphor generative of poetic wonders which can awaken the readers from Life’s deadening ‘mist of familiarity’. I conclude by arguing that what proves most fertile in this poem is ultimately Shelley’s reworking and revitalizing of a hackneyed metaphor – that of the pageant itself.","PeriodicalId":41387,"journal":{"name":"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW","volume":"36 1","pages":"93 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09524142.2022.2151202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this essay, I use the notion of fertility to examine what is left of Erasmus Darwin’s influence on Percy Shelley in his last, unfinished poem, ‘The Triumph of Life’. My aim is to shed light on Shelley’s use of pageantry in this poem in a new way, bearing in mind Darwin’s frequent use of botanical pageants in The Loves of the Plants and in The Temple of Nature, that is, poems which notoriously influenced Shelley in Queen Mab and Prometheus Unbound. Shelley’s pageant in ‘The Triumph of Life’ is the enactment of the ‘mutiny within’ (l. 213), which is opposed to the dominion of love in Prometheus Unbound and to Darwin’s idea that good outbalances evil (The Temple of Nature, IV, 135–45). While on the surface Shelley ironically reverses the positive connotations of fertility which characterize the Darwinian botanical pageant, he nonetheless preserves this fertility metaphorically, resorting to the pageant as a metaphor generative of poetic wonders which can awaken the readers from Life’s deadening ‘mist of familiarity’. I conclude by arguing that what proves most fertile in this poem is ultimately Shelley’s reworking and revitalizing of a hackneyed metaphor – that of the pageant itself.
《生命的胜利》:“那条从未有花生长的道路”:生育能力出错的壮观场面
摘要在这篇文章中,我用生育的概念来考察伊拉斯谟·达尔文在其最后一首未完成的诗《生命的胜利》中对珀西·雪莱的影响。我的目的是以一种新的方式来阐明雪莱在这首诗中对壮观场面的使用,因为达尔文在《植物的爱》和《自然的圣殿》中经常使用植物的壮观场面,也就是说,众所周知,这些诗在《马布女王》和《解放的普罗米修斯》中影响了雪莱。雪莱在《生命的胜利》(TheTriumphofLife)中的精彩表演是对“内部叛变”(l.213)的演绎,这与《普罗米修斯》(PrometheusUnbound)中的爱的统治以及达尔文关于善战胜恶的观点(《自然之殿》,IV135-45)背道而驰。从表面上看,雪莱讽刺地推翻了达尔文植物盛会中生育能力的积极内涵,但他仍然隐喻性地保留了这种生育能力,将盛会作为诗歌奇迹的隐喻,可以将读者从令人窒息的“熟悉的迷雾”中唤醒。最后,我认为这首诗中最丰富的东西最终是雪莱对一个老生常谈的隐喻——选美本身——的重新塑造和振兴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Keats-Shelley Review has been published by the Keats-Shelley Memorial Association for almost 100 years. It has a unique identity and broad appeal, embracing Romanticism, English Literature and Anglo-Italian relations. A diverse range of items are published within the Review, including notes, prize-winning essays and contemporary poetry of the highest quality, around a core of peer-reviewed academic articles, essays and reviews. The editor, Professor Nicholas Roe, along with the newly established editorial board, seeks to develop the depth and quality of the contributions, whilst retaining the Review’s distinctive and accessible nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信