Optimization of Drilling Well Design: A Review

Saif Khudhair, Faleh H. M. Al-Mahdawi
{"title":"Optimization of Drilling Well Design: A Review","authors":"Saif Khudhair, Faleh H. M. Al-Mahdawi","doi":"10.31699/ijcpe.2022.4.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drilling well design optimization reduces total Authorization for Expenditures (AFE) by decreasing well constructing time and expense. Well design is not a constant pattern during the life cycle of the field. It should be optimized by continuous improvements for all aspects of redesigning the well depending on the actual field conditions and problems. The core objective of this study is to deliver a general review of the well design optimization processes and the available studies and applications to employ the well design optimization to solve problems encountered with well design so that cost effectiveness and perfect drilling well performance are achievable. Well design optimization processes include unconventional design(slimhole) compared with fat design, in addition to optimizing casing setting depth selection and casing string loads. Finally, we demonstrate well trajectory design considerations and optimization. The optimization process that mentioned above is significantly reduce drilling cost and time since, slimhole design with smaller casing and hole size reduce mud volume cost, steel cost and pump fuel cost. Optimum casing seat selection can ovoid serious problem such as kick and losses that increase nonproductive time (NPT) if kick tolerance and downhole pressure profile is not considered. Anticipating optimum stress loads in casing design is most effective way to reduce casing strings cost avoiding additional cost for designing with useless worst conditions. Wellbore trajectory optimization with geomechnic consideration is major concern to reduce the problem encountered with high torque, drag, formation collapse that result stuck pipe and non-productive time (NPT).","PeriodicalId":53067,"journal":{"name":"Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31699/ijcpe.2022.4.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Drilling well design optimization reduces total Authorization for Expenditures (AFE) by decreasing well constructing time and expense. Well design is not a constant pattern during the life cycle of the field. It should be optimized by continuous improvements for all aspects of redesigning the well depending on the actual field conditions and problems. The core objective of this study is to deliver a general review of the well design optimization processes and the available studies and applications to employ the well design optimization to solve problems encountered with well design so that cost effectiveness and perfect drilling well performance are achievable. Well design optimization processes include unconventional design(slimhole) compared with fat design, in addition to optimizing casing setting depth selection and casing string loads. Finally, we demonstrate well trajectory design considerations and optimization. The optimization process that mentioned above is significantly reduce drilling cost and time since, slimhole design with smaller casing and hole size reduce mud volume cost, steel cost and pump fuel cost. Optimum casing seat selection can ovoid serious problem such as kick and losses that increase nonproductive time (NPT) if kick tolerance and downhole pressure profile is not considered. Anticipating optimum stress loads in casing design is most effective way to reduce casing strings cost avoiding additional cost for designing with useless worst conditions. Wellbore trajectory optimization with geomechnic consideration is major concern to reduce the problem encountered with high torque, drag, formation collapse that result stuck pipe and non-productive time (NPT).
钻井优化设计综述
钻井设计优化通过减少建井时间和费用来减少总支出授权(AFE)。在油田的生命周期中,油井设计并不是一种不变的模式。应根据现场实际情况和问题,在重新设计油井的各个方面进行持续改进,从而对其进行优化。本研究的核心目标是对井设计优化过程以及可用的研究和应用进行全面回顾,以利用井设计优化来解决井设计中遇到的问题,从而实现成本效益和完美的钻井性能。井设计优化过程除了优化套管下入深度选择和套管柱载荷外,还包括与胖设计相比的非常规设计(细孔)。最后,我们展示了井轨迹设计的注意事项和优化。上述优化过程显著降低了钻井成本和时间,因为具有较小套管和孔径的细孔设计降低了泥浆体积成本、钢材成本和泵燃料成本。如果不考虑井涌公差和井下压力剖面,最佳的套管座选择可能会避免井涌和损失等严重问题,这些问题会增加非生产时间(NPT)。在套管设计中预测最佳应力载荷是降低套管柱成本的最有效方法,避免了在无用的最坏条件下设计的额外成本。考虑地质技术的井筒轨迹优化是减少高扭矩、阻力、地层坍塌问题的主要关注点,这些问题会导致卡管和非生产时间(NPT)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信