Conversion from Alloplastic to Autologous Breast Reconstruction: What Are the Inciting Factors?

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Plastic surgery Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-15 DOI:10.1177/22925503221107214
Brendon Bitoiu, Sofie Schlagintweit, Zach Zhang, Esta Bovill, Kathryn Isaac, Sheina Macadam
{"title":"Conversion from Alloplastic to Autologous Breast Reconstruction: What Are the Inciting Factors?","authors":"Brendon Bitoiu, Sofie Schlagintweit, Zach Zhang, Esta Bovill, Kathryn Isaac, Sheina Macadam","doi":"10.1177/22925503221107214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Failure of alloplastic breast reconstruction is an uncommon occurrence that may result in abandonment of reconstructive efforts or salvage with conversion to autologous reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that predict failure of alloplastic breast reconstruction and conversion to autologous reconstruction. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who underwent mastectomy and immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction between 2008 and 2019. Inclusion criteria included patients 18 years or older who underwent initial alloplastic reconstruction with a minimum of 3-year follow-up. Data collected included age, body mass index, cancer type, surgical characteristics, neo/adjuvant treatment details, and complications. Results were analyzed using Fischer's exact test, <i>t</i>-test, and multivariate logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> A total of 234 patients met inclusion criteria. Of those, 23 (9.8%) required conversion from alloplastic to autologous reconstruction. Converted patients had a mean age of 50.1 ± 8.5. The time from initial alloplastic reconstruction to conversion was 30.7 months. The most common reasons for conversion included soft tissue deficiency (48%), infection (30%), and capsular contracture (22%). Patients were converted to deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP; 52%), latissimus dorsi flap with implant (26%), and DIEP with implant (22%). Multivariate logistic regression modeling identified radiation (OR 8.4 [CI = 1.7-40.1]) and periprosthetic infection (OR 14.6 [CI = 3.4-63.8]) as predictors for conversion. <b>Conclusions:</b> Among patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction, those treated with radiation have 8.4 greater odds of conversion and those with a periprosthetic infection have 14.6 greater odds for conversion to an autologous reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11046274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503221107214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Failure of alloplastic breast reconstruction is an uncommon occurrence that may result in abandonment of reconstructive efforts or salvage with conversion to autologous reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that predict failure of alloplastic breast reconstruction and conversion to autologous reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who underwent mastectomy and immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction between 2008 and 2019. Inclusion criteria included patients 18 years or older who underwent initial alloplastic reconstruction with a minimum of 3-year follow-up. Data collected included age, body mass index, cancer type, surgical characteristics, neo/adjuvant treatment details, and complications. Results were analyzed using Fischer's exact test, t-test, and multivariate logistic regression. Results: A total of 234 patients met inclusion criteria. Of those, 23 (9.8%) required conversion from alloplastic to autologous reconstruction. Converted patients had a mean age of 50.1 ± 8.5. The time from initial alloplastic reconstruction to conversion was 30.7 months. The most common reasons for conversion included soft tissue deficiency (48%), infection (30%), and capsular contracture (22%). Patients were converted to deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP; 52%), latissimus dorsi flap with implant (26%), and DIEP with implant (22%). Multivariate logistic regression modeling identified radiation (OR 8.4 [CI = 1.7-40.1]) and periprosthetic infection (OR 14.6 [CI = 3.4-63.8]) as predictors for conversion. Conclusions: Among patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction, those treated with radiation have 8.4 greater odds of conversion and those with a periprosthetic infection have 14.6 greater odds for conversion to an autologous reconstruction.

从同种异体乳房重建到自体乳房重建的转换:切口因素是什么?
同种异体乳房重建失败是一种罕见的情况,可能导致放弃重建努力或挽救与转换为自体重建。本研究的目的是确定预测同种异体乳房重建失败和转向自体乳房重建的因素。方法:回顾性分析2008年至2019年接受乳房切除术并立即进行同种异体乳房重建的患者。纳入标准包括18岁或以上接受初次异体重建且至少随访3年的患者。收集的数据包括年龄、体重指数、癌症类型、手术特点、新/辅助治疗细节和并发症。采用Fischer精确检验、t检验和多元逻辑回归对结果进行分析。结果:234例患者符合纳入标准。其中23例(9.8%)需要从同种异体移植到自体移植。转换患者的平均年龄为50.1±8.5岁。从最初的同种异体重建到转化时间为30.7个月。最常见的转换原因包括软组织缺损(48%)、感染(30%)和包膜挛缩(22%)。患者行腹下深穿支皮瓣(DIEP;52%),背阔肌瓣带种植体(26%),DIEP带种植体(22%)。多变量logistic回归模型确定辐射(OR 8.4 [CI = 1.7-40.1])和假体周围感染(OR 14.6 [CI = 3.4-63.8])是转化的预测因子。结论:在接受乳房切除术并立即进行同种异体乳房重建的患者中,接受放射治疗的患者转化为自体重建的几率高出8.4倍,而假体周围感染的患者转化为自体重建的几率高出14.6倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plastic surgery
Plastic surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信