The global management accounting principles (GMAP) and the relationship between organizational design elements

IF 2.4 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
B. Oyewo, V. Tauringana, Babajide Moses Omikunle, Olusola Owoyele
{"title":"The global management accounting principles (GMAP) and the relationship between organizational design elements","authors":"B. Oyewo, V. Tauringana, Babajide Moses Omikunle, Olusola Owoyele","doi":"10.1108/arj-07-2020-0202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to investigate the relationship between organizational design elements (i.e. quality of management accounting skills and performance management system, PMS), management accounting practice (MAP) sophistication and organizational competitiveness using the Global Management Accounting Principles (GMAP) framework.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nSurvey data was obtained through a structured questionnaire from 131 Nigerian firms. Measures of the quality of management accounting skills, robustness of PMS structure, MAP sophistication and organizational competitiveness were derived from the GMAP framework. Structural equation modelling was applied to explore the complexity of relationship among variables.\n\n\nFindings\nWhile the quality of management accounting skills was found to have a positive but insignificant impact on MAP sophistication, the impact of PMS structure on MAP sophistication was positive and significant. MAP sophistication has a positive impact on organizational competitiveness, but the magnitude of its contribution appears to depend on the quality of management accounting skills and the robustness of PMS structure. The inability of MAP sophistication to exert much influence on organizational competitiveness is attributable to the low contribution of management accounting skills. The result supports the proposition that performance is optimized when all organizational design elements are concurrently improved.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study shows that organizations need to critically look into the quality of skills possessed by personnel in the accounting function, as all organizational design elements must be given equal importance to achieve the best results.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study contributes to knowledge by investigating the quality of management accounting skills and the robustness of PMS as organizational design elements affecting MAP and organizational competitiveness using the GMAP framework. The study operationalizes some elements of the GMAP framework by developing measurements that can be used by future studies.\n","PeriodicalId":45591,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Research Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-07-2020-0202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the relationship between organizational design elements (i.e. quality of management accounting skills and performance management system, PMS), management accounting practice (MAP) sophistication and organizational competitiveness using the Global Management Accounting Principles (GMAP) framework. Design/methodology/approach Survey data was obtained through a structured questionnaire from 131 Nigerian firms. Measures of the quality of management accounting skills, robustness of PMS structure, MAP sophistication and organizational competitiveness were derived from the GMAP framework. Structural equation modelling was applied to explore the complexity of relationship among variables. Findings While the quality of management accounting skills was found to have a positive but insignificant impact on MAP sophistication, the impact of PMS structure on MAP sophistication was positive and significant. MAP sophistication has a positive impact on organizational competitiveness, but the magnitude of its contribution appears to depend on the quality of management accounting skills and the robustness of PMS structure. The inability of MAP sophistication to exert much influence on organizational competitiveness is attributable to the low contribution of management accounting skills. The result supports the proposition that performance is optimized when all organizational design elements are concurrently improved. Practical implications The study shows that organizations need to critically look into the quality of skills possessed by personnel in the accounting function, as all organizational design elements must be given equal importance to achieve the best results. Originality/value The study contributes to knowledge by investigating the quality of management accounting skills and the robustness of PMS as organizational design elements affecting MAP and organizational competitiveness using the GMAP framework. The study operationalizes some elements of the GMAP framework by developing measurements that can be used by future studies.
全球管理会计原则(GMAP)与组织设计要素之间的关系
目的本研究旨在利用全球管理会计原则(GMAP)框架,研究组织设计要素(即管理会计技能和绩效管理系统(PMS)的质量)、管理会计实践(MAP)的复杂性和组织竞争力之间的关系。设计/方法/方法通过131家尼日利亚公司的结构化问卷获得调查数据。管理会计技能的质量、PMS结构的稳健性、MAP复杂性和组织竞争力的衡量标准来自GMAP框架。应用结构方程模型来探索变量之间关系的复杂性。发现虽然管理会计技能的质量对MAP复杂度有积极但不显著的影响,但PMS结构对MAP复杂程度的影响是积极和显著的。MAP复杂度对组织竞争力有积极影响,但其贡献的大小似乎取决于管理会计技能的质量和PMS结构的稳健性。MAP复杂性无法对组织竞争力产生很大影响,这归因于管理会计技能的贡献较低。该结果支持这样一种观点,即当所有组织设计元素都同时得到改进时,性能就会得到优化。实际含义研究表明,组织需要批判性地审视会计职能人员所拥有的技能质量,因为所有组织设计要素都必须同等重要,才能取得最佳效果。独创性/价值本研究通过使用GMAP框架调查管理会计技能的质量和PMS作为影响MAP和组织竞争力的组织设计要素的稳健性,为知识做出贡献。该研究通过制定可供未来研究使用的衡量标准,对全球海洋环境状况评估框架的一些要素进行了操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounting Research Journal
Accounting Research Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信