Referendum Model Forecasts: Trump and the 2022 Midterm Errors

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Polity Pub Date : 2023-05-23 DOI:10.1086/725242
C. Tien, M. Lewis-Beck
{"title":"Referendum Model Forecasts: Trump and the 2022 Midterm Errors","authors":"C. Tien, M. Lewis-Beck","doi":"10.1086/725242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To forecast the 2022 congressional races, we returned to our structural model, which we have utilized to good effect since 2010. Our forecasts for 2022 were published before the election. The model rests on strong theory and expresses itself in a political economy equation. For the House, which we focus on in this brief essay, midterms are assumed to be referenda on the president and the incumbent party, where voters reward or punish according to key economic and political issues, as measured by aggregate indicators. These ex ante national forecasts we adjust a bit, to account for local conditions via expert judgement. In 2022, our Structure-X forecast for the House foresaw a Democratic loss of thirty-seven seats. This prediction is correct in that it foretells the ruling party would experience a net loss, so upholding the “iron law” of midterm incumbent performance. Moreover, this loss technically falls, just barely, within the 95% confidence interval for the structural OLS equation (i.e., 37 1/2 (1.96 # 18.82) 5 [.11 to 73.84].) Thus, when strictly judged as an outlier, it lands on the line. Nevertheless, there is no denying the error of twenty-eight seats looks large (given the actual Democratic loss of nine seats). Here we begin to assess the source of","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To forecast the 2022 congressional races, we returned to our structural model, which we have utilized to good effect since 2010. Our forecasts for 2022 were published before the election. The model rests on strong theory and expresses itself in a political economy equation. For the House, which we focus on in this brief essay, midterms are assumed to be referenda on the president and the incumbent party, where voters reward or punish according to key economic and political issues, as measured by aggregate indicators. These ex ante national forecasts we adjust a bit, to account for local conditions via expert judgement. In 2022, our Structure-X forecast for the House foresaw a Democratic loss of thirty-seven seats. This prediction is correct in that it foretells the ruling party would experience a net loss, so upholding the “iron law” of midterm incumbent performance. Moreover, this loss technically falls, just barely, within the 95% confidence interval for the structural OLS equation (i.e., 37 1/2 (1.96 # 18.82) 5 [.11 to 73.84].) Thus, when strictly judged as an outlier, it lands on the line. Nevertheless, there is no denying the error of twenty-eight seats looks large (given the actual Democratic loss of nine seats). Here we begin to assess the source of
公投模型预测:特朗普和2022年中期选举的错误
为了预测2022年的国会选举,我们回到了我们的结构模型,自2010年以来,我们一直使用该模型取得了良好效果。我们对2022年的预测是在大选前公布的。该模型建立在强有力的理论基础上,并以政治经济学方程式表达自己。对于我们在这篇短文中关注的众议院来说,中期选举被认为是对总统和现任政党的公民投票,选民根据关键的经济和政治问题进行奖励或惩罚,以综合指标衡量。我们对这些事前的国家预测进行了一些调整,以通过专家判断考虑当地情况。2022年,我们对众议院结构X的预测预测民主党将失去37个席位。这一预测是正确的,因为它预测执政党将经历净亏损,因此坚持了中期在任表现的“铁律”。此外,从技术上讲,这种损失几乎没有落在结构OLS方程的95%置信区间内(即,37 1/2(1.96#18.82)5[.11-73.84]。)因此,当严格判断为异常值时,它会落在线上。尽管如此,不可否认,28个席位的误差看起来很大(考虑到民主党实际失去了9个席位)。在这里,我们开始评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polity
Polity POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信