Trade Costs and Demand-Enhancing Effects of Agrifood Standards: Consequences for Sub-Saharan Africa

Aristide Djimgou Tchakounte, D. Fiankor
{"title":"Trade Costs and Demand-Enhancing Effects of Agrifood Standards: Consequences for Sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"Aristide Djimgou Tchakounte, D. Fiankor","doi":"10.2991/jat.k.210907.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agrifoodstandardsimpedetradebyincreasingcompliancecosts,buttheycanalsoenhancetradebysignallingquality.Thispaperdisentanglesthetradecostsanddemand-enhancingeffectsoftwoimportantstandards—technicalbarrierstotrade,andsanitary and phytosanitary measures—on (i) global agricultural trade flows and (ii) fruit, nut, and vegetable trade between sub-Saharan Africa and high-income OECD countries. Combining estimates from unit value and trade value regressions set within structural gravity frameworks, we show that trading standards increase trade costs—which exporters pass on to consumers in the form of higher prices—but they also increase trade volume. For agrifood exports from sub-Saharan Africa, compliance with standards guarantees market access at higher prices to high-value OECD markets. disentangled the increased trade costs and demand-enhancing effects of sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) and TBT measures imposed on fruit, nut, and vegetable trade between sub-Saharan African countries and high-income OECD member states. found that measures increase trade costs and unambiguously raise unit values—either through passed-on compliance costs, quality upgrading, or a combination of the two mechanisms—but they also increase trade volume. For technical barriers to trade (TBT) measures, strong a effect. There are also no associated price effects for TBT measures.","PeriodicalId":33808,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Trade","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Trade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/jat.k.210907.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agrifoodstandardsimpedetradebyincreasingcompliancecosts,buttheycanalsoenhancetradebysignallingquality.Thispaperdisentanglesthetradecostsanddemand-enhancingeffectsoftwoimportantstandards—technicalbarrierstotrade,andsanitary and phytosanitary measures—on (i) global agricultural trade flows and (ii) fruit, nut, and vegetable trade between sub-Saharan Africa and high-income OECD countries. Combining estimates from unit value and trade value regressions set within structural gravity frameworks, we show that trading standards increase trade costs—which exporters pass on to consumers in the form of higher prices—but they also increase trade volume. For agrifood exports from sub-Saharan Africa, compliance with standards guarantees market access at higher prices to high-value OECD markets. disentangled the increased trade costs and demand-enhancing effects of sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) and TBT measures imposed on fruit, nut, and vegetable trade between sub-Saharan African countries and high-income OECD member states. found that measures increase trade costs and unambiguously raise unit values—either through passed-on compliance costs, quality upgrading, or a combination of the two mechanisms—but they also increase trade volume. For technical barriers to trade (TBT) measures, strong a effect. There are also no associated price effects for TBT measures.
农产品标准的贸易成本和需求增长效应:对撒哈拉以南非洲的影响
农业食品标准通过增加合规成本简化了贸易,但分析通过信号质量提高了贸易。本文理清了贸易成本和需求增强两个重要标准——贸易技术壁垒和卫生与植物检疫措施——对(i)全球农业贸易流动和(ii)撒哈拉以南非洲与高收入经合组织国家之间的水果、坚果和蔬菜贸易的影响。结合在结构引力框架内设定的单位价值和贸易价值回归的估计,我们发现贸易标准增加了贸易成本——出口商以更高的价格将其转嫁给消费者——但它们也增加了贸易量。对于撒哈拉以南非洲的农产品出口,遵守标准可以保证以更高的价格进入高价值的经合组织市场。消除了撒哈拉以南非洲国家与高收入经合组织成员国之间对水果、坚果和蔬菜贸易实施的卫生与植物检疫措施和TBT措施增加的贸易成本和增加需求的影响。研究发现,这些措施增加了贸易成本,并明确提高了单位价值——要么是通过转嫁合规成本、质量升级,要么是这两种机制的结合——但它们也增加了贸易量。对于技术性贸易壁垒(TBT)措施,效果较强。TBT措施也没有相关的价格影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
63 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信