A Path not Taken: Wei Yung, ‘Multi-System Nations’, and Cross-Strait Relations in the 1980s

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
J. Feng
{"title":"A Path not Taken: Wei Yung, ‘Multi-System Nations’, and Cross-Strait Relations in the 1980s","authors":"J. Feng","doi":"10.1080/10357823.2023.2198196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There is an increasingly popular standpoint that the rise of Taiwanese identity has transformed Cross-Strait relations. The discourses of pro-unification are regarded as the antithesis of pro-independence. Seemingly, the shift from Han Chinese identity to Taiwanese identity has been a rupture in the recent development of Cross-Strait relations. This study sheds light on Wei Yung (Wei Yong, 1936–2004) and his concept of ‘multi-system nations’ to reassess this standpoint. Wei wanted to assist Taipei in recalibrating Cross-Strait relations in the late 20th century. He initiated the ‘multi-system nations’ concept to justify Taipei’s adoption of dual recognition and parallel (international) participation. Wei used this concept to defend Taiwanese political scientists’ collective representation in the International Political Science Association. However, the result was not as he had wished. Although Wei's concept of ‘multi-system nations’ is outdated and his wishful thinking about China’s unification has become a path not taken for both Taipei and Beijing, this study shows that there is in fact common ground between the sympathisers of pro-independence and the advocates of unification.","PeriodicalId":46499,"journal":{"name":"Asian Studies Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"818 - 835"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2023.2198196","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is an increasingly popular standpoint that the rise of Taiwanese identity has transformed Cross-Strait relations. The discourses of pro-unification are regarded as the antithesis of pro-independence. Seemingly, the shift from Han Chinese identity to Taiwanese identity has been a rupture in the recent development of Cross-Strait relations. This study sheds light on Wei Yung (Wei Yong, 1936–2004) and his concept of ‘multi-system nations’ to reassess this standpoint. Wei wanted to assist Taipei in recalibrating Cross-Strait relations in the late 20th century. He initiated the ‘multi-system nations’ concept to justify Taipei’s adoption of dual recognition and parallel (international) participation. Wei used this concept to defend Taiwanese political scientists’ collective representation in the International Political Science Association. However, the result was not as he had wished. Although Wei's concept of ‘multi-system nations’ is outdated and his wishful thinking about China’s unification has become a path not taken for both Taipei and Beijing, this study shows that there is in fact common ground between the sympathisers of pro-independence and the advocates of unification.
未走的路:魏勇、“多体制国家”与1980年代的两岸关系
越来越多的人认为,台湾认同的崛起改变了两岸关系。主张统一的话语被视为主张独立的话语的对立面。从汉人身份到台湾人身份的转变,似乎是最近两岸关系发展中的一个断裂。本研究揭示了魏勇(Wei Yong, 1936-2004)及其“多体系国家”的概念,以重新评估这一观点。魏希望在20世纪后期帮助台北重新调整两岸关系。他提出了“多体系国家”的概念,以证明台北采取双重承认和平等(国际)参与的合理性。魏用这个概念来捍卫台湾政治科学家在国际政治科学协会的集体代表权。然而,结果并不如他所愿。虽然魏的“多体制国家”的概念已经过时,他对中国统一的一厢情愿的想法已经成为台北和北京都没有采取的道路,但这项研究表明,支持独立的同情者和主张统一的人之间实际上存在共同点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信