Pushing seismic resolution to the limit with FWI imaging

Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Leading Edge Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1190/tle42010024.1
Zhiyuan Wei, J. Mei, Zedong Wu, Zhigang Zhang, Rongxin Huang, Ping Wang
{"title":"Pushing seismic resolution to the limit with FWI imaging","authors":"Zhiyuan Wei, J. Mei, Zedong Wu, Zhigang Zhang, Rongxin Huang, Ping Wang","doi":"10.1190/tle42010024.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the resolution of a seismic image is ultimately bound by the spatial and temporal sampling of the acquired seismic data, the seismic images obtained through conventional imaging methods normally fall very short of this limit. Conventional seismic imaging methods take a piecemeal approach to imaging problems with many steps designed in preprocessing, velocity model building, migration, and postprocessing to solve one or a few specific issues at each step. The inefficacies of each step and the disconnects between them lead to various issues such as velocity errors, residual noise and multiples, illumination holes, and migration swings that prevent conventional imaging methods from obtaining a high-resolution image with good signal-to-noise (S/N) and well-focused details. In contrast, full-waveform inversion (FWI) imaging models and uses the full-wavefield data including primaries and multiples and reflection and transmission waves to iteratively invert for the velocity and reflectivity in one go. It is a systemic approach to address imaging issues. FWI imaging has proven to be a superior method over conventional imaging methods because it provides seismic images with greatly improved illumination, S/N, focusing, and resolution. We demonstrate with a towed-streamer data set and an ocean-bottom-node (OBN) data set that FWI imaging with a frequency close to the temporal resolution limit of seismic data (100 Hz or higher) can provide seismic images with unprecedented resolution from the acquired seismic data. This has been impossible to achieve with conventional imaging methods. Moreover, incorporating more accurate physics into FWI imaging (e.g., upgrading the modeling engine from acoustic to elastic) can further improve the seismic resolution substantially. Elastic FWI imaging can further reduce the mismatch between modeled and recorded data, especially around bodies of large impedance contrast such as salt. It appreciably improves the S/N and resolution of the inverted images. We show with an OBN data set in the Gulf of Mexico that elastic FWI imaging further improves the resolution of salt models and subsalt images over its acoustic counterpart.","PeriodicalId":35661,"journal":{"name":"Leading Edge","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leading Edge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/tle42010024.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although the resolution of a seismic image is ultimately bound by the spatial and temporal sampling of the acquired seismic data, the seismic images obtained through conventional imaging methods normally fall very short of this limit. Conventional seismic imaging methods take a piecemeal approach to imaging problems with many steps designed in preprocessing, velocity model building, migration, and postprocessing to solve one or a few specific issues at each step. The inefficacies of each step and the disconnects between them lead to various issues such as velocity errors, residual noise and multiples, illumination holes, and migration swings that prevent conventional imaging methods from obtaining a high-resolution image with good signal-to-noise (S/N) and well-focused details. In contrast, full-waveform inversion (FWI) imaging models and uses the full-wavefield data including primaries and multiples and reflection and transmission waves to iteratively invert for the velocity and reflectivity in one go. It is a systemic approach to address imaging issues. FWI imaging has proven to be a superior method over conventional imaging methods because it provides seismic images with greatly improved illumination, S/N, focusing, and resolution. We demonstrate with a towed-streamer data set and an ocean-bottom-node (OBN) data set that FWI imaging with a frequency close to the temporal resolution limit of seismic data (100 Hz or higher) can provide seismic images with unprecedented resolution from the acquired seismic data. This has been impossible to achieve with conventional imaging methods. Moreover, incorporating more accurate physics into FWI imaging (e.g., upgrading the modeling engine from acoustic to elastic) can further improve the seismic resolution substantially. Elastic FWI imaging can further reduce the mismatch between modeled and recorded data, especially around bodies of large impedance contrast such as salt. It appreciably improves the S/N and resolution of the inverted images. We show with an OBN data set in the Gulf of Mexico that elastic FWI imaging further improves the resolution of salt models and subsalt images over its acoustic counterpart.
利用FWI成像技术将地震分辨率推向极限
尽管地震图像的分辨率最终受到所采集地震数据的空间和时间采样的限制,但通过传统成像方法获得的地震图像通常远远达不到这一限制。传统的地震成像方法采用零碎的方法来解决成像问题,在预处理、速度模型构建、偏移和后处理中设计了许多步骤,以解决每个步骤中的一个或几个特定问题。每个步骤的无效性以及它们之间的脱节导致了各种问题,如速度误差、残余噪声和倍数、照明孔和偏移摆动,这些问题阻碍了传统成像方法获得具有良好信噪比(S/N)和良好聚焦细节的高分辨率图像。相反,全波形反演(FWI)成像建模并使用包括基波和多次波以及反射波和透射波的全波场数据来一次性迭代反演速度和反射率。这是一种解决成像问题的系统方法。FWI成像已被证明是一种优于传统成像方法的方法,因为它为地震图像提供了大大改进的照明、S/N、聚焦和分辨率。我们用拖缆数据集和海底节点(OBN)数据集证明,频率接近地震数据时间分辨率极限(100Hz或更高)的FWI成像可以从采集的地震数据中提供前所未有的分辨率的地震图像。这在传统成像方法中是不可能实现的。此外,将更精确的物理学纳入FWI成像(例如,将建模引擎从声学升级为弹性)可以进一步大幅提高地震分辨率。弹性FWI成像可以进一步减少建模数据和记录数据之间的不匹配,尤其是在具有大阻抗对比度的物体(如盐)周围。它明显提高了反转图像的S/N和分辨率。我们用墨西哥湾的OBN数据集表明,弹性FWI成像比声学成像进一步提高了盐模型和盐下图像的分辨率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Leading Edge
Leading Edge Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
180
期刊介绍: THE LEADING EDGE complements GEOPHYSICS, SEG"s peer-reviewed publication long unrivalled as the world"s most respected vehicle for dissemination of developments in exploration and development geophysics. TLE is a gateway publication, introducing new geophysical theory, instrumentation, and established practices to scientists in a wide range of geoscience disciplines. Most material is presented in a semitechnical manner that minimizes mathematical theory and emphasizes practical applications. TLE also serves as SEG"s publication venue for official society business.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信