The relationship between the quantity and duration of post-operative physiotherapy treatment and patient outcomes following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review

IF 0.8 Q4 REHABILITATION
Wayne A. Fausett, D. Reid, P. Larmer
{"title":"The relationship between the quantity and duration of post-operative physiotherapy treatment and patient outcomes following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review","authors":"Wayne A. Fausett, D. Reid, P. Larmer","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2023.2195213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Functional rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is often physiotherapist-led, and generally required to achieve patient goals. The quantity and duration of physiotherapist-led following could therefore potentially influence outcomes following ACLR, although the nature of this relationship is not clear. Objective To clarify the relationship between the quantity and duration of post-operative physiotherapy treatment and patient outcomes following ACLR. Methods A search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO databases was made from inception to March 2021 to identify relevant studies. Key characteristics of the selected studies were extracted, with methodological quality evaluated using a modified version of the Downs and Black appraisal tool. Results The search strategy identified 1137 studies, 15 of which met inclusion criteria. Two studies were rated strong methodological quality, eight were rated moderate, and five were rated limited. Results across all 15 studies provided conflicting evidence regarding the effects of the quantity and duration of physiotherapy treatment on patient outcomes following ACLR. Conclusions Based on evidence of variable methodological quality, a clear relationship between the quantity and duration of physiotherapy treatment and patient outcomes following ACLR could not be established. Several themes were identified to guide future research in this area, including ensuring participant homogeneity, monitoring participant adherence to unsupervised rehabilitation, and utilising rehabilitation interventions that replicate everyday physiotherapy practice.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2023.2195213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Functional rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is often physiotherapist-led, and generally required to achieve patient goals. The quantity and duration of physiotherapist-led following could therefore potentially influence outcomes following ACLR, although the nature of this relationship is not clear. Objective To clarify the relationship between the quantity and duration of post-operative physiotherapy treatment and patient outcomes following ACLR. Methods A search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO databases was made from inception to March 2021 to identify relevant studies. Key characteristics of the selected studies were extracted, with methodological quality evaluated using a modified version of the Downs and Black appraisal tool. Results The search strategy identified 1137 studies, 15 of which met inclusion criteria. Two studies were rated strong methodological quality, eight were rated moderate, and five were rated limited. Results across all 15 studies provided conflicting evidence regarding the effects of the quantity and duration of physiotherapy treatment on patient outcomes following ACLR. Conclusions Based on evidence of variable methodological quality, a clear relationship between the quantity and duration of physiotherapy treatment and patient outcomes following ACLR could not be established. Several themes were identified to guide future research in this area, including ensuring participant homogeneity, monitoring participant adherence to unsupervised rehabilitation, and utilising rehabilitation interventions that replicate everyday physiotherapy practice.
原发性前交叉韧带重建术后物理治疗的数量和持续时间与患者预后的关系:一项系统综述
背景前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后的功能康复通常由物理治疗师主导,通常需要实现患者的目标。因此,物理治疗师主导的随访的数量和持续时间可能会影响ACLR后的结果,尽管这种关系的性质尚不清楚。目的探讨ACLR术后物理治疗的数量和时间与患者预后的关系。方法检索PubMed/MEDLINE、谷歌Scholar、Cochrane Library和EBSCO数据库,从数据库成立至2021年3月检索相关研究。提取所选研究的关键特征,并使用改进版的Downs和Black评估工具对方法学质量进行评估。结果检索策略共纳入1137项研究,其中15项符合纳入标准。两项研究的方法学质量被评为强,八项研究被评为中等,五项研究被评为有限。所有15项研究的结果都提供了相互矛盾的证据,证明物理治疗的数量和持续时间对ACLR后患者预后的影响。结论:基于不同方法学质量的证据,不能确定ACLR后物理治疗的数量和持续时间与患者预后之间的明确关系。确定了指导该领域未来研究的几个主题,包括确保参与者的同质性,监测参与者对无监督康复的依从性,以及利用复制日常物理治疗实践的康复干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Therapy Reviews
Physical Therapy Reviews REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy Reviews is an international journal which aims to publish contemporary reviews, discussion papers and editorials within physical therapy, and in those basic and clinical sciences which are the basis of physical therapy. The journal is aimed at all those involved in research, teaching and practice within the area of physical therapy. Reviews (both descriptive and systematic) are invited in the following areas, which reflect the breadth and diversity of practice within physical therapy: •neurological rehabilitation •movement and exercise •orthopaedics and rheumatology •manual therapy and massage •sports medicine •measurement •chest physiotherapy •electrotherapeutics •obstetrics and gynaecology •complementary therapies •professional issues •musculoskeletal rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信