{"title":"Forgiveness, restorative justice and reconciliation in sustainable peacebuilding: contemporary debates and future possibilities","authors":"J. Boehle","doi":"10.1080/14781158.2021.1910226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since the mid 1990s, growing attention has been given in the scholarly debate and in the public sphere to forgiveness, restorative justice and reconciliation in peacebuilding. These concepts have been reflected upon and highlighted as core components of restoring right relationships and in sustainable peacebuilding: at first focusing mainly on individuals and relations between them and later as well on relations of communities and states in the public sphere. Attempts to better understand forgiveness and reconciliation in relation to peacebuilding have to address also the critical issue of how to safeguard and integrate processes of justice into peace processes. After first clarifying the distinction between retributive and restorative justice, this article considers core findings of Daniel Philpott, John Paul Lederach and Leonel Narvaez in their peacebuilding studies and considers selected, contemporary reconciliation and peace initiatives. The article argues that forgiveness, restorative justice and reconciliation processes should be further mainstreamed and integrated as part of any standard response to major conflicts and wars by national political bodies, religious communities and religious/secular NGOs, international organisations, agencies and institutions: in order to positively and sustainably resolve and transform conflicts, wars and violence between groups, and to build sustainable peace.","PeriodicalId":44867,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Peace & Security","volume":"33 1","pages":"103 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14781158.2021.1910226","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Peace & Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2021.1910226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT Since the mid 1990s, growing attention has been given in the scholarly debate and in the public sphere to forgiveness, restorative justice and reconciliation in peacebuilding. These concepts have been reflected upon and highlighted as core components of restoring right relationships and in sustainable peacebuilding: at first focusing mainly on individuals and relations between them and later as well on relations of communities and states in the public sphere. Attempts to better understand forgiveness and reconciliation in relation to peacebuilding have to address also the critical issue of how to safeguard and integrate processes of justice into peace processes. After first clarifying the distinction between retributive and restorative justice, this article considers core findings of Daniel Philpott, John Paul Lederach and Leonel Narvaez in their peacebuilding studies and considers selected, contemporary reconciliation and peace initiatives. The article argues that forgiveness, restorative justice and reconciliation processes should be further mainstreamed and integrated as part of any standard response to major conflicts and wars by national political bodies, religious communities and religious/secular NGOs, international organisations, agencies and institutions: in order to positively and sustainably resolve and transform conflicts, wars and violence between groups, and to build sustainable peace.
摘要自20世纪90年代中期以来,学术辩论和公共领域越来越关注建设和平中的宽恕、恢复性司法与和解。这些概念被反映和强调为恢复正确关系和可持续建设和平的核心组成部分:起初主要关注个人及其之间的关系,后来主要关注社区和国家在公共领域的关系。为了更好地理解与建设和平有关的宽恕与和解,还必须解决如何保障司法进程并将其纳入和平进程这一关键问题。在首先澄清了报复性司法和恢复性司法之间的区别之后,本文考虑了Daniel Philpott、John Paul Lederach和Leonel Narvaez在建设和平研究中的核心发现,并考虑了选定的当代和解与和平倡议。文章认为,国家政治机构、宗教团体和宗教/世俗非政府组织、国际组织、机构和机构应对重大冲突和战争的任何标准措施都应进一步将宽恕、恢复性司法和和解进程纳入主流并加以整合:,团体之间的战争和暴力,以及建设可持续和平。