Japanese/Korean popular culture in Kuwait and Singapore: Resistance and conservatism

Q2 Social Sciences
T. Botz-Bornstein
{"title":"Japanese/Korean popular culture in Kuwait and Singapore: Resistance and conservatism","authors":"T. Botz-Bornstein","doi":"10.1386/eapc_00088_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2017, I launched a survey on the importance of Japanese and Korean popular cultures in Kuwait. I discovered a paradoxical pattern of resistance to the East through the adherence to another eastern culture. I wanted to examine how other non-western countries handle ‘Japanese culture’ in comparison and decided to adopt Singapore as a sample case. Both Kuwaiti and Singaporean students stress the differences between Japan/Korea and their own country, but also insist on similarities. In both surveys there is a strong emphasis on ethics. Both are impressed by the Japanese politeness and their capacity to organize life, and most reasonings evolve around the theme of ‘conservatism’. Singaporean students, when asked about Japan and Korea, point to conservative patterns predating what they perceive as the Americanization of Asia. The positive values located in this part of East Asia correspond with precisely those values that Kuwaiti students (as well as Singaporean Muslim students) single out as particularly compatible with Islamic mindsets. In both countries, respondents see Korea/Japan as the ‘real’ Confucian/Muslim nations harking back to more pristine values. Negative evaluations, for example of hallyu as a soft power for Korean economic interest, are almost absent.","PeriodicalId":36135,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Journal of Popular Culture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Journal of Popular Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/eapc_00088_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2017, I launched a survey on the importance of Japanese and Korean popular cultures in Kuwait. I discovered a paradoxical pattern of resistance to the East through the adherence to another eastern culture. I wanted to examine how other non-western countries handle ‘Japanese culture’ in comparison and decided to adopt Singapore as a sample case. Both Kuwaiti and Singaporean students stress the differences between Japan/Korea and their own country, but also insist on similarities. In both surveys there is a strong emphasis on ethics. Both are impressed by the Japanese politeness and their capacity to organize life, and most reasonings evolve around the theme of ‘conservatism’. Singaporean students, when asked about Japan and Korea, point to conservative patterns predating what they perceive as the Americanization of Asia. The positive values located in this part of East Asia correspond with precisely those values that Kuwaiti students (as well as Singaporean Muslim students) single out as particularly compatible with Islamic mindsets. In both countries, respondents see Korea/Japan as the ‘real’ Confucian/Muslim nations harking back to more pristine values. Negative evaluations, for example of hallyu as a soft power for Korean economic interest, are almost absent.
科威特和新加坡的日韩流行文化:抵抗和保守主义
2017年,我发起了一项关于日韩流行文化在科威特重要性的调查。我发现了一种通过坚持另一种东方文化来抵抗东方的矛盾模式。我想比较一下其他非西方国家是如何处理“日本文化”的,并决定以新加坡为例。科威特和新加坡的学生都强调日本/韩国和自己国家之间的差异,但也坚持相似之处。在这两项调查中,都非常强调道德。两人都对日本人的礼貌和组织生活的能力印象深刻,大多数推理都围绕着“保守主义”的主题展开。当被问及日本和韩国时,新加坡学生指出,在他们认为亚洲美国化之前,日本和韩国就存在保守模式。东亚这一地区的积极价值观恰恰与科威特学生(以及新加坡穆斯林学生)认为特别符合伊斯兰心态的价值观相吻合。在这两个国家,受访者都认为韩国/日本是“真正的”儒家/穆斯林国家,它们回归了更原始的价值观。像“韩流是韩国经济利益的软实力”这样的负面评价几乎没有出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
East Asian Journal of Popular Culture
East Asian Journal of Popular Culture Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信