{"title":"The Neogrammarian hypothesis and pandemic irregularity*","authors":"Robert Blust","doi":"10.1075/jhl.20027.blu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n At least three types of sound change (prenasalization of obstruents, lenition of obstruents, conversion of labial\n consonants to the corresponding labiovelars) are widespread in the Austronesian language family as sporadic innovations. What\n marks these off as different from more familiar types of irregularity is their repeated occurrence across hundreds of related\n languages, a phenomenon that can conveniently be called “pandemic irregularity.” All attempts to find an explanation for why\n pandemic irregularities occur in terms of possibly unrecognized affixation, conditioning, borrowing, or unfinished processes, have\n proven futile. In particular, it is stressed that pandemic irregularity in sound change is fundamentally different from “lexical\n diffusion”, and deserves to be recognized in its own right as a process that works against the general application of the\n regularity hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.20027.blu","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
At least three types of sound change (prenasalization of obstruents, lenition of obstruents, conversion of labial
consonants to the corresponding labiovelars) are widespread in the Austronesian language family as sporadic innovations. What
marks these off as different from more familiar types of irregularity is their repeated occurrence across hundreds of related
languages, a phenomenon that can conveniently be called “pandemic irregularity.” All attempts to find an explanation for why
pandemic irregularities occur in terms of possibly unrecognized affixation, conditioning, borrowing, or unfinished processes, have
proven futile. In particular, it is stressed that pandemic irregularity in sound change is fundamentally different from “lexical
diffusion”, and deserves to be recognized in its own right as a process that works against the general application of the
regularity hypothesis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.