Intrusive or Relevant? Exploring How Consumers Avoid Native Facebook Ads through Decomposed Persuasion Knowledge

IF 4.2 Q2 BUSINESS
C. Ham, Sann Ryu, Joonghwa Lee, Un-Chae Chaung, Emily Buteau, Sela Sar
{"title":"Intrusive or Relevant? Exploring How Consumers Avoid Native Facebook Ads through Decomposed Persuasion Knowledge","authors":"C. Ham, Sann Ryu, Joonghwa Lee, Un-Chae Chaung, Emily Buteau, Sela Sar","doi":"10.1080/10641734.2021.1944934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study investigates the mechanism underlying how consumers cope with native advertising on the Facebook newsfeed, particularly focusing on ad avoidance. Native ads on Facebook have unique features in that they are both intrusive and relevant to users. Study 1 (survey: N = 501) decomposed a persuasion knowledge construct into dispositional, conceptual, and attitudinal features to address how multidimensional constructs of persuasion knowledge are associated with ad avoidance in response to the intrusiveness and relevance of native advertising. Study 2 (experiment: N = 157) employed a 2 × 2 between-subject experimental design to examine causal relationships between the same variables. The results of both studies revealed that dispositional persuasion knowledge was more significant than situational factors in activating conceptual and attitudinal persuasion knowledge. Conceptual persuasion knowledge directly increased ad avoidance. Contrary to expectations, attitudes toward native ads did not play any intermediary role between persuasion knowledge and native ad avoidance. Implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":43045,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Issues and Research In Advertising","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Issues and Research In Advertising","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2021.1944934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the mechanism underlying how consumers cope with native advertising on the Facebook newsfeed, particularly focusing on ad avoidance. Native ads on Facebook have unique features in that they are both intrusive and relevant to users. Study 1 (survey: N = 501) decomposed a persuasion knowledge construct into dispositional, conceptual, and attitudinal features to address how multidimensional constructs of persuasion knowledge are associated with ad avoidance in response to the intrusiveness and relevance of native advertising. Study 2 (experiment: N = 157) employed a 2 × 2 between-subject experimental design to examine causal relationships between the same variables. The results of both studies revealed that dispositional persuasion knowledge was more significant than situational factors in activating conceptual and attitudinal persuasion knowledge. Conceptual persuasion knowledge directly increased ad avoidance. Contrary to expectations, attitudes toward native ads did not play any intermediary role between persuasion knowledge and native ad avoidance. Implications are discussed.
侵入性还是相关性?通过分解说服知识探索消费者如何避免原生Facebook广告
摘要本研究调查了消费者如何应对Facebook新闻推送上的原生广告的机制,特别是关注广告回避。脸书上的原生广告具有独特的功能,即具有侵入性,又与用户相关。研究1(调查:N = 501)将说服知识结构分解为倾向性、概念性和态度性特征,以解决说服知识的多维结构如何与响应本地广告的侵入性和相关性的广告回避相关联。研究2(实验:N = 157)使用了2 × 2受试者之间的实验设计,考察相同变量之间的因果关系。两项研究的结果都表明,在激活概念和态度说服知识方面,倾向性说服知识比情境因素更重要。概念说服知识直接增加了广告回避。与预期相反,对本土广告的态度在说服知识和本土广告回避之间没有发挥任何中介作用。讨论了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
32.40%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信