Effect of preconditioning on retention of glass ionomer pit and fissure sealant: An in vivo 9-month study

Q3 Health Professions
S. Zaghloul, S. El-sayed, E. Mohamed
{"title":"Effect of preconditioning on retention of glass ionomer pit and fissure sealant: An in vivo 9-month study","authors":"S. Zaghloul, S. El-sayed, E. Mohamed","doi":"10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_20_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Caries prevention using fissure sealants is directly proportional to their retention. This in vivo study evaluated the effect of preconditioning on retention of glass ionomer (GI) fissure sealant, in maxillary and mandibular primary and permanent teeth. Subjects and Methods: Two hundred and forty teeth in 30 children of 6-8 years age range were involved. In all participants, the second primary and the first permanent molars in each quadrant were investigated following split-mouth design; so that, selected teeth in the right side had their pits and fissures conditioned before GI sealant application (Group A: n = 120 teeth). In the left side, however, the same sealant was applied without preconditioning (Group B: n = 120). According to Simonsen's sealant retention criteria, clinical assessment was performed at 3, 6, and 9 months. Data were gained then statistically analyzed using Chi-square test. Results: A significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) was evident between both groups at the three assessment intervals, with better sealant retention in preconditioned group. Although no significant difference appeared between primary and permanent teeth, maxillary teeth were significantly better in sealant retention than mandibular ones. Conclusions: Preconditioning enhanced GI sealant retention, more durable caries prevention can be thus provided easily with low cost.","PeriodicalId":33866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"343 - 347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_20_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Caries prevention using fissure sealants is directly proportional to their retention. This in vivo study evaluated the effect of preconditioning on retention of glass ionomer (GI) fissure sealant, in maxillary and mandibular primary and permanent teeth. Subjects and Methods: Two hundred and forty teeth in 30 children of 6-8 years age range were involved. In all participants, the second primary and the first permanent molars in each quadrant were investigated following split-mouth design; so that, selected teeth in the right side had their pits and fissures conditioned before GI sealant application (Group A: n = 120 teeth). In the left side, however, the same sealant was applied without preconditioning (Group B: n = 120). According to Simonsen's sealant retention criteria, clinical assessment was performed at 3, 6, and 9 months. Data were gained then statistically analyzed using Chi-square test. Results: A significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) was evident between both groups at the three assessment intervals, with better sealant retention in preconditioned group. Although no significant difference appeared between primary and permanent teeth, maxillary teeth were significantly better in sealant retention than mandibular ones. Conclusions: Preconditioning enhanced GI sealant retention, more durable caries prevention can be thus provided easily with low cost.
预处理对玻璃离聚物窝沟封闭剂滞留的影响:一项为期9个月的体内研究
目的:使用裂隙封闭剂预防龋齿与保留率成正比。这项体内研究评估了预处理对玻璃离聚物(GI)裂隙封闭剂在上颌和下颌乳牙和恒牙中保留的影响。受试者和方法:对30名6-8岁儿童的240颗牙齿进行研究。在所有参与者中,按照开口设计对每个象限的第二颗主磨牙和第一颗恒磨牙进行了研究;使得右侧的选定牙齿在施用GI密封剂之前对其凹坑和裂缝进行了处理(A组:n=120个牙齿)。然而,在左侧,在没有预处理的情况下使用相同的密封剂(B组:n=120)。根据Simonsen的密封剂保留标准,在3、6和9个月时进行临床评估。获得数据,然后使用卡方检验进行统计分析。结果:在三个评估区间,两组之间有显著差异(P≤0.05),预处理组的密封剂保留率更好。尽管乳牙和恒牙之间没有显著差异,但上颌牙在密封剂保留方面明显优于下颌牙。结论:预处理可以提高GI封闭剂的保留率,从而以低成本提供更持久的龋齿预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信