The Liability of Health Care Providers to Third Parties Injured by a Patient

Samuel D. Hodge
{"title":"The Liability of Health Care Providers to Third Parties Injured by a Patient","authors":"Samuel D. Hodge","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.2038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Duty of care is a critical component of any negligence claim necessary to establish liability. It is well recognized at common law that a physician owes a duty to advise a patient but is not mandated to take affirmative measures outside the physicianpatient relationship to protect a third-party. Health care providers may also be responsible for oversight, or the failure to safeguard a patient, due to a special relationship they undertake, such as failing to properly diagnose or recommend an appropriate treatment plan. Recently, the courts have struggled over whether public policy and fairness require the expansion of the law to impose liability upon health care providers for injuries sustained by third parties caused by patients in motor vehicle accidents. Various theories are advanced to establish liability, such as the physician being negligent by violating a statute created to protect the public through negligence per se, establishing prima facie negligence, or offering evidence of carelessness. A clear court consensus has failed to emerge whether the common law should be expanded in favor of responsibility. This article will provide a brief history of the efforts to enlarge physician liability to third parties. It will then focus on the cases that have arisen against physicians by a third party injured in a motor vehicle accident related to a patient’s medical condition or medication side-effects. This is a dilemma confronting the courts on a regular basis. K.R. was a troubled soul who suffered from depression, recreational drug use, and questionable seizures.1 Several physicians prescribed various pharmaceuticals, some of which are known to cause drowsiness.2 She was told not to drive, but this was not a significant concern because her boyfriend took her 1. K.R. is the driver’s initials who caused the accident, and a pseudonym to protect her confidentiality because of a civil commitment. Bland v. K.R., No. A-1837-18T1, 2020 WL 2510361, at *1 n.3 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. May 15, 2020). 2. Id. at *4. 2 https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol41/iss2/4 2021 LIABILITY OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS 151","PeriodicalId":82250,"journal":{"name":"Pace law review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58948/2331-3528.2038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Duty of care is a critical component of any negligence claim necessary to establish liability. It is well recognized at common law that a physician owes a duty to advise a patient but is not mandated to take affirmative measures outside the physicianpatient relationship to protect a third-party. Health care providers may also be responsible for oversight, or the failure to safeguard a patient, due to a special relationship they undertake, such as failing to properly diagnose or recommend an appropriate treatment plan. Recently, the courts have struggled over whether public policy and fairness require the expansion of the law to impose liability upon health care providers for injuries sustained by third parties caused by patients in motor vehicle accidents. Various theories are advanced to establish liability, such as the physician being negligent by violating a statute created to protect the public through negligence per se, establishing prima facie negligence, or offering evidence of carelessness. A clear court consensus has failed to emerge whether the common law should be expanded in favor of responsibility. This article will provide a brief history of the efforts to enlarge physician liability to third parties. It will then focus on the cases that have arisen against physicians by a third party injured in a motor vehicle accident related to a patient’s medical condition or medication side-effects. This is a dilemma confronting the courts on a regular basis. K.R. was a troubled soul who suffered from depression, recreational drug use, and questionable seizures.1 Several physicians prescribed various pharmaceuticals, some of which are known to cause drowsiness.2 She was told not to drive, but this was not a significant concern because her boyfriend took her 1. K.R. is the driver’s initials who caused the accident, and a pseudonym to protect her confidentiality because of a civil commitment. Bland v. K.R., No. A-1837-18T1, 2020 WL 2510361, at *1 n.3 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. May 15, 2020). 2. Id. at *4. 2 https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol41/iss2/4 2021 LIABILITY OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS 151
医疗服务提供者对受患者伤害的第三方的责任
注意义务是确定责任所必需的任何过失索赔的关键组成部分。普通法公认,医生有义务为患者提供建议,但无权在医患关系之外采取积极措施保护第三方。医疗保健提供者也可能负责监督,或由于他们所承担的特殊关系而未能保护患者,例如未能正确诊断或建议适当的治疗计划。最近,法院一直在争论公共政策和公平性是否需要扩大法律,以规定医疗保健提供者对机动车事故中患者造成的第三方伤害承担责任。人们提出了各种理论来确定责任,例如医生因疏忽本身违反了为保护公众而制定的法规而疏忽,确立了表面上的疏忽,或提供了疏忽的证据。法院未能就是否应扩大普通法以支持责任达成明确共识。本文将简要介绍扩大医生对第三方责任的努力历史。然后,它将重点关注在与患者的医疗状况或药物副作用有关的机动车事故中受伤的第三方对医生提起的诉讼。这是法院经常面临的困境。K.R.是一个有问题的人,患有抑郁症、娱乐性药物使用和可疑的癫痫发作。1几位医生开了各种药物,其中一些已知会引起嗜睡。2她被告知不要开车,但这并不是一个大问题,因为她的男朋友带了她。K.R.是造成事故的司机的首字母缩写,由于民事承诺,为了保护她的机密,她使用了假名。Bland诉K.R.案,编号A-1837-18T12020 WL 2510361,见*1 n.3(新泽西州最高法院上诉庭,2020年5月15日)。2.同上,*4。2.https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol41/iss2/42021医疗保健提供者的责任151
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书