Access to Higher Education in the Age of Welfare Reform: Implications for Policy

Marya R. Sosulski
{"title":"Access to Higher Education in the Age of Welfare Reform: Implications for Policy","authors":"Marya R. Sosulski","doi":"10.29034/ijmra.v13n3a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, increasing access to higher education for low-income people is a seemingly relentless challenge. Welfare reform, implemented in 1997 under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Program, introduced requirements for an unprecedented proportion of recipients to participate full-time in work-like activities or lose benefits. These requirements constrain recipients’ activities and present significant barriers to enrolling and persisting in higher education. Yet, many welfare recipients assert that post-secondary education is their best, if not only, option for improving their life chances and those of their families. Studies in the first decade of welfare reform provided valuable information about the importance of access to education and training for welfare recipients; but it is unclear what role public benefits, such as cash assistance and subsidies for education-related expenses, play in helping welfare recipients enroll. Welfare college option policies can help, but only if accompanied by multiple supports specific to higher education access. This article explores the nature of the relationship between public assistance benefits and welfare recipients’ enrollment in higher education. The study combines quantitative analysis of statewide survey data from the Illinois Families Study and an embedded qualitative sample that participated in two waves of in-depth interviews. The study contributes a view of individual, community-level, and structural factors significantly associated with post-secondary enrollment and the respondents’ perspectives on why and how these factors operate to help or to hinder their efforts. Understanding access to higher education for welfare recipients in Illinois—a state with a relatively liberal college option policy but low enrollment—is instrumental to creating policy solutions that augment existing pathways to post-secondary education for this group, as well as new inroads.","PeriodicalId":89571,"journal":{"name":"International journal of multiple research approaches","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of multiple research approaches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29034/ijmra.v13n3a1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the United States, increasing access to higher education for low-income people is a seemingly relentless challenge. Welfare reform, implemented in 1997 under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Program, introduced requirements for an unprecedented proportion of recipients to participate full-time in work-like activities or lose benefits. These requirements constrain recipients’ activities and present significant barriers to enrolling and persisting in higher education. Yet, many welfare recipients assert that post-secondary education is their best, if not only, option for improving their life chances and those of their families. Studies in the first decade of welfare reform provided valuable information about the importance of access to education and training for welfare recipients; but it is unclear what role public benefits, such as cash assistance and subsidies for education-related expenses, play in helping welfare recipients enroll. Welfare college option policies can help, but only if accompanied by multiple supports specific to higher education access. This article explores the nature of the relationship between public assistance benefits and welfare recipients’ enrollment in higher education. The study combines quantitative analysis of statewide survey data from the Illinois Families Study and an embedded qualitative sample that participated in two waves of in-depth interviews. The study contributes a view of individual, community-level, and structural factors significantly associated with post-secondary enrollment and the respondents’ perspectives on why and how these factors operate to help or to hinder their efforts. Understanding access to higher education for welfare recipients in Illinois—a state with a relatively liberal college option policy but low enrollment—is instrumental to creating policy solutions that augment existing pathways to post-secondary education for this group, as well as new inroads.
福利改革时代的高等教育机会:政策启示
在美国,增加低收入人群接受高等教育的机会似乎是一个无情的挑战。1997年,根据贫困家庭临时援助计划实施了福利改革,要求空前比例的领取者全职参加类似工作的活动或失去福利。这些要求限制了受教育者的活动,并对入学和继续接受高等教育构成了重大障碍。然而,许多福利领取者断言,中学后教育是他们改善自己和家人生活机会的最佳选择,如果不是唯一的选择的话。福利改革第一个十年的研究提供了关于福利领取者获得教育和培训的重要性的宝贵信息;但目前尚不清楚现金援助和教育相关费用补贴等公共福利在帮助福利领取者入学方面发挥了什么作用。福利大学选择政策可以提供帮助,但前提是要有针对高等教育机会的多种支持。本文探讨了公共援助福利与福利对象高等教育入学之间关系的性质。这项研究结合了伊利诺伊州家庭研究对全州调查数据的定量分析,以及参与两波深入访谈的嵌入式定性样本。该研究提供了与中学后入学显著相关的个人、社区和结构因素的观点,以及受访者对这些因素为什么以及如何帮助或阻碍他们的努力的看法。了解伊利诺伊州福利领取者接受高等教育的机会,有助于制定政策解决方案,扩大这一群体现有的中学后教育途径,并取得新的进展。伊利诺伊州的大学选择政策相对宽松,但入学率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信