Considerações sobre o conceito de campesinato para Alta Idade Média

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY
E. C. Daflon
{"title":"Considerações sobre o conceito de campesinato para Alta Idade Média","authors":"E. C. Daflon","doi":"10.24215/22505121E056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The word “peasant” is frequently used to address a series of rural realities, very diverse points in time and space. It is a term with long tradition in the Humanities, which goes back at least to the 19th century. However, since the 1980’s there was a dramatic shortage in works focused on this social actors. For the pre-capitalist world in general – and the medieval in particular – we have societies with the absolute majority of the population based in the countryside living from the work in the fields. In spite of that, peasant studies did not find great repercussion in medievalism; aristocracies tend to deserve much more attention from historians than those who cultivate the soil. As result, although the word peasant is not rare in medieval history, it does not come along with a deeper conceptual reflexion. The present text argues that a more precise use of the concept of “peasantry” would bring analytical and historiographical gains to the research of this historically heterogeneous group. With this in mind, a bibliography revision is made in order to propose a theoretical approach the (early) medieval peasantry.","PeriodicalId":40822,"journal":{"name":"Sociedades Precapitalistas","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociedades Precapitalistas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24215/22505121E056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The word “peasant” is frequently used to address a series of rural realities, very diverse points in time and space. It is a term with long tradition in the Humanities, which goes back at least to the 19th century. However, since the 1980’s there was a dramatic shortage in works focused on this social actors. For the pre-capitalist world in general – and the medieval in particular – we have societies with the absolute majority of the population based in the countryside living from the work in the fields. In spite of that, peasant studies did not find great repercussion in medievalism; aristocracies tend to deserve much more attention from historians than those who cultivate the soil. As result, although the word peasant is not rare in medieval history, it does not come along with a deeper conceptual reflexion. The present text argues that a more precise use of the concept of “peasantry” would bring analytical and historiographical gains to the research of this historically heterogeneous group. With this in mind, a bibliography revision is made in order to propose a theoretical approach the (early) medieval peasantry.
对中世纪早期农民概念的思考
“农民”这个词经常被用来描述一系列在时间和空间上非常不同的农村现实。这个词在人文学科中有着悠久的传统,至少可以追溯到19世纪。然而,自20世纪80年代以来,关注这一社会角色的作品急剧短缺。一般来说,在资本主义之前的世界——尤其是中世纪——我们的社会中,绝大多数人口居住在农村,靠在地里干活为生。尽管如此,农学研究在中世纪并没有得到很大的反响;贵族往往比耕种土地的人更值得历史学家关注。因此,尽管“农民”一词在中世纪历史上并不罕见,但它并没有伴随着更深层次的概念反思。本文认为,更精确地使用“农民”这一概念将为研究这一历史异质性群体带来分析和史学上的收获。考虑到这一点,为了提出(早期)中世纪农民的理论方法,对参考书目进行了修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信