Maximizing Science Outreach on Facebook: An Analysis of Scientists’ Communication Strategies in Taiwan

IF 2.6 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Adrian Rauchfleisch, Johanna Kao, Tzu-Hsuan Tseng, Chia-Tzu Ho, Lu-Yi Li
{"title":"Maximizing Science Outreach on Facebook: An Analysis of Scientists’ Communication Strategies in Taiwan","authors":"Adrian Rauchfleisch, Johanna Kao, Tzu-Hsuan Tseng, Chia-Tzu Ho, Lu-Yi Li","doi":"10.17645/mac.v11i1.6080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The internet, and especially social media platforms, offer scientists new opportunities to connect with a broader public. While many studies have focused on science communication on Twitter, surprisingly few have analyzed how scientists use Facebook, even though it is an essential platform for the general public in many countries. A possible explanation for this lack of research is that scientists keep their Facebook profiles separate from their work life and are more active on Twitter in their professional roles. Our study challenges this assumption by focusing on Taiwan as a peculiar case. Due to the local culture, Twitter is less popular there, and scientists are more active on Facebook, even in their professional roles. In our study, we analyzed 35 public pages of scientists on Facebook and assessed the factors explaining the reach of their communication using content analysis in combination with a multilevel model that allowed us to test predictors on the page level, such as the number of fans, in combination with predictors on the post level, such as the complexity of the language used. Our study shows that Facebook can play an influential role in science outreach. To effectively communicate with the audience on Facebook, it is best to use strategies that appeal to new and existing followers. Posts that address current issues and include opinions are likely to be shared widely, while humor or personal self-disclosure is likely to engage the existing audience. Our study contributes to the current debate about alternatives to Twitter in science communication.","PeriodicalId":18348,"journal":{"name":"Media and Communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The internet, and especially social media platforms, offer scientists new opportunities to connect with a broader public. While many studies have focused on science communication on Twitter, surprisingly few have analyzed how scientists use Facebook, even though it is an essential platform for the general public in many countries. A possible explanation for this lack of research is that scientists keep their Facebook profiles separate from their work life and are more active on Twitter in their professional roles. Our study challenges this assumption by focusing on Taiwan as a peculiar case. Due to the local culture, Twitter is less popular there, and scientists are more active on Facebook, even in their professional roles. In our study, we analyzed 35 public pages of scientists on Facebook and assessed the factors explaining the reach of their communication using content analysis in combination with a multilevel model that allowed us to test predictors on the page level, such as the number of fans, in combination with predictors on the post level, such as the complexity of the language used. Our study shows that Facebook can play an influential role in science outreach. To effectively communicate with the audience on Facebook, it is best to use strategies that appeal to new and existing followers. Posts that address current issues and include opinions are likely to be shared widely, while humor or personal self-disclosure is likely to engage the existing audience. Our study contributes to the current debate about alternatives to Twitter in science communication.
Facebook上科学拓展的最大化——台湾科学家交流策略分析
互联网,尤其是社交媒体平台,为科学家提供了与更广泛公众联系的新机会。尽管许多研究都集中在推特上的科学交流上,但令人惊讶的是,很少有人分析科学家如何使用脸书,尽管脸书是许多国家公众的重要平台。缺乏研究的一个可能解释是,科学家将他们的Facebook个人资料与工作生活分开,并在Twitter上更积极地扮演他们的职业角色。我们的研究通过将台湾作为一个特例来挑战这一假设。由于当地文化的原因,推特在那里不太受欢迎,科学家们在脸书上更活跃,即使是在他们的职业角色上。在我们的研究中,我们分析了Facebook上35个科学家的公共页面,并使用内容分析和多层次模型评估了解释他们交流范围的因素,该模型允许我们测试页面层面的预测因素,如粉丝数量,以及帖子层面的预测因子,如所用语言的复杂性。我们的研究表明,脸书可以在科学推广方面发挥重要作用。为了在脸书上与观众有效沟通,最好使用吸引新粉丝和现有粉丝的策略。涉及当前问题并包含意见的帖子可能会被广泛分享,而幽默或个人自我揭露可能会吸引现有受众。我们的研究为当前关于推特在科学传播中的替代方案的辩论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Media and Communication
Media and Communication COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Media and Communication (ISSN: 2183-2439) is an international open access journal dedicated to a wide variety of basic and applied research in communication and its related fields
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信