Beyond Direct Indexing: Dynamic Direct Long-Short Investing

SSRN Pub Date : 2023-08-05 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4437402
Joseph Liberman, Stanley Krasner, Nathan Sosner, Pedro Freitas
{"title":"Beyond Direct Indexing: Dynamic Direct Long-Short Investing","authors":"Joseph Liberman, Stanley Krasner, Nathan Sosner, Pedro Freitas","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4437402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On average, net losses realized by direct indexing loss-harvesting strategies taper off within the first few years after their inception. In our historical simulations, they reach a maximum average cumulative level of about 30% of the initially invested capital. In addition, direct indexing strategies exhibit a high dispersion of net loss outcomes. Long-short strategies motivated by factor investing can significantly outperform direct indexing strategies from both a pre-tax and tax perspective. We model two types of long-short factor-based strategies: relaxed-constraint and composite long-short. Both types of strategies, if implemented with a sufficiently high level of leverage and tracking error, can realize a cumulative net capital loss of 100% of the invested capital within a few years and, at the same time, substantially outperform the benchmark index before tax, net of implementation costs. We further show that leverage and tracking error of long-short strategies can be managed dynamically in a highly tax-efficient manner. For example, an investor who becomes less optimistic about the prospects of factor investing can reduce the leverage and tracking error substantially, albeit not all the way to zero, without recognizing net capital gains. We find that a full liquidation of the long and short extensions results in realization of most of the previously deferred gains.","PeriodicalId":74863,"journal":{"name":"SSRN","volume":"14 1","pages":"10 - 41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSRN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4437402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

On average, net losses realized by direct indexing loss-harvesting strategies taper off within the first few years after their inception. In our historical simulations, they reach a maximum average cumulative level of about 30% of the initially invested capital. In addition, direct indexing strategies exhibit a high dispersion of net loss outcomes. Long-short strategies motivated by factor investing can significantly outperform direct indexing strategies from both a pre-tax and tax perspective. We model two types of long-short factor-based strategies: relaxed-constraint and composite long-short. Both types of strategies, if implemented with a sufficiently high level of leverage and tracking error, can realize a cumulative net capital loss of 100% of the invested capital within a few years and, at the same time, substantially outperform the benchmark index before tax, net of implementation costs. We further show that leverage and tracking error of long-short strategies can be managed dynamically in a highly tax-efficient manner. For example, an investor who becomes less optimistic about the prospects of factor investing can reduce the leverage and tracking error substantially, albeit not all the way to zero, without recognizing net capital gains. We find that a full liquidation of the long and short extensions results in realization of most of the previously deferred gains.
超越直接指数:动态直接多空投资
平均而言,通过直接指数化亏损收集策略实现的净亏损在其启动后的最初几年内逐渐减少。在我们的历史模拟中,它们达到了最高平均累积水平,约为初始投资资本的30%。此外,直接指数策略表现出净损失结果的高度分散。从税前和税后的角度来看,因子投资驱动的多空策略都明显优于直接指数策略。我们建立了两种基于因素的多空策略模型:松弛约束策略和复合多空策略。这两种策略,如果在足够高的杠杆水平和跟踪误差的情况下实施,都可以在几年内实现投资资本100%的累计净资本损失,同时在扣除实施成本后,其税前表现大大优于基准指数。我们进一步表明,多空策略的杠杆和跟踪误差可以以高度节税的方式动态管理。例如,一个对要素投资前景不那么乐观的投资者可以在不承认净资本收益的情况下,大幅减少杠杆和跟踪误差,尽管不是完全为零。我们发现,长期和短期延期的完全清算导致大部分先前递延利得的实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信