Pacifista, between Vice and Virtue: Funding Digital Journalism for a “Generation of Peace” in Colombia

A. Fattal
{"title":"Pacifista, between Vice and Virtue: Funding Digital Journalism for a “Generation of Peace” in Colombia","authors":"A. Fattal","doi":"10.1080/19428200.2020.1884481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is the story of Pacifista. Pacifista is a left-leaning, youth-focused, pro-peace digital-native journalism initiative (meaning it is not the digital version of an established publication) in Colombia. It has been an important outlet that has worked to bridge the breach between urban youth culture and the war-torn countryside in Colombia. Yet, despite its novel editorial approach to timely subject matter, vibrant graphic design and potentially lucrative ability to connect with millennial audiences in Colombia, it struggles to survive financially. This article is about that struggle. As a more freewheeling digital journalism comes to supplant traditional reporting, questions about how digital media’s political economy influences the stories it produces and circulates are vital to understanding transformations in the digital public sphere. In parsing the case of Pacifista, I want to suggest that the same pressures that scholars have identified in allowing corporate interests to subtly condition legacy media’s news production through their advertising budgets are at work in digital-native media. A key difference is that online editorial projects, like Pacifista, often lack the institutional culture and protocols to mediate inevitable conflicts between the editorial and advertising sides of the news business.1 The argument is not intended to be a critique of Pacifista as much as an alarm about the lack of a stable funding model for novel digital journalism projects that cut against the grain of corporate interests. While other scholars have made similar arguments in Western contexts, in less wealthy countries, where subscription models are less viable, such projects are even more vulnerable.2 In the last WhatsApp message that one of my interlocutors at Pacifista sent me, he urged me to publish my article soon “Before Pacifista dies, jajajaja” adding in the next bubble “It’s going broke.” I hope that, by the time you are reading this, the publication will still be posting.","PeriodicalId":90439,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology now","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19428200.2020.1884481","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology now","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19428200.2020.1884481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is the story of Pacifista. Pacifista is a left-leaning, youth-focused, pro-peace digital-native journalism initiative (meaning it is not the digital version of an established publication) in Colombia. It has been an important outlet that has worked to bridge the breach between urban youth culture and the war-torn countryside in Colombia. Yet, despite its novel editorial approach to timely subject matter, vibrant graphic design and potentially lucrative ability to connect with millennial audiences in Colombia, it struggles to survive financially. This article is about that struggle. As a more freewheeling digital journalism comes to supplant traditional reporting, questions about how digital media’s political economy influences the stories it produces and circulates are vital to understanding transformations in the digital public sphere. In parsing the case of Pacifista, I want to suggest that the same pressures that scholars have identified in allowing corporate interests to subtly condition legacy media’s news production through their advertising budgets are at work in digital-native media. A key difference is that online editorial projects, like Pacifista, often lack the institutional culture and protocols to mediate inevitable conflicts between the editorial and advertising sides of the news business.1 The argument is not intended to be a critique of Pacifista as much as an alarm about the lack of a stable funding model for novel digital journalism projects that cut against the grain of corporate interests. While other scholars have made similar arguments in Western contexts, in less wealthy countries, where subscription models are less viable, such projects are even more vulnerable.2 In the last WhatsApp message that one of my interlocutors at Pacifista sent me, he urged me to publish my article soon “Before Pacifista dies, jajajaja” adding in the next bubble “It’s going broke.” I hope that, by the time you are reading this, the publication will still be posting.
Pacifista,在邪恶与美德之间:资助哥伦比亚“和平一代”的数字新闻
这是帕西菲斯塔的故事。Pacifista是哥伦比亚的一个左倾、以青年为中心、支持和平的数字本土新闻倡议(意味着它不是一个既定出版物的数字版本)。它一直是一个重要的渠道,致力于弥合哥伦比亚城市青年文化和饱受战争蹂躏的农村之间的裂痕。然而,尽管它对及时的主题采用了新颖的编辑方法,充满活力的平面设计,以及与哥伦比亚千禧一代观众建立联系的潜在利润丰厚的能力,但它在经济上难以生存。这篇文章是关于这场斗争的。随着一种更自由的数字新闻取代了传统报道,关于数字媒体的政治经济如何影响其制作和传播的故事的问题对于理解数字公共领域的变革至关重要。在分析Pacifista的案例时,我想表明,学者们在允许企业利益通过广告预算微妙地调节传统媒体的新闻制作方面所发现的同样压力,也在数字原生媒体中发挥作用。一个关键的区别是,像Pacifista这样的在线编辑项目,通常缺乏制度文化和协议来调解新闻业务编辑和广告双方之间不可避免的冲突。1这一论点并不是对Pacifista的批评,而是对缺乏稳定的资助模式来资助违背企业利益的新型数字新闻项目的警告。虽然其他学者在西方背景下也提出了类似的论点,但在不太富裕的国家,订阅模式不太可行,这类项目更容易受到攻击。2在我在Pacifista的一位对话者发给我的最后一条WhatsApp消息中,他敦促我尽快发表我的文章“在Pacifita去世之前,jajajaja”,并在下一个泡沫中补充道“它要破产了。”。“我希望,当你读到这篇文章时,该出版物仍将发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信