A Holistic Exploration of the Collecting and Connecting Experiences of LGBTQ+ Communities, Their Independent Archives and the GLAMU Sector in New Zealand

IF 1 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Alison Day
{"title":"A Holistic Exploration of the Collecting and Connecting Experiences of LGBTQ+ Communities, Their Independent Archives and the GLAMU Sector in New Zealand","authors":"Alison Day","doi":"10.1080/24750158.2023.2212941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LGBTQ+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer) activism has played a significant role in effecting legislative and social change in New Zealand and internationally, promulgating public attitudinal shifts towards tolerance and inclusion. These societal changes do not however appear to have resulted in the visible representation of the LGBTQ+ communities in New Zealand’s galleries, libraries, archives, museums and universities (GLAMU), a phenomenon recognised elsewhere. American historian Jim Downs (2021, p. 31) stated that ‘LGBT people have been the leading and often exclusive archivists of their own history; beginning in the 1970s and continuing until today’. LGBTQ+ communities have been driven to establish their own independent archives to document and preserve their stories. The lack of GLAMU institutional recognition of LGBTQ+ communities explicitly in their collections and services has been noted within the information science field. Scholars have expressed consternation at the lack of representation and visibility of LGBTQ+ communities in GLAMU institutions and the omission of LGBTQ+ historical context (Chenier, 2010; McIntyre, 2007). LGBTQ+ communities should be recognised in cultural heritage documentation and accurately represented in national and local narratives. My research will explore what is occurring in the collecting, documenting, and donating space with respect to New Zealand LGBTQ+ communities, LGBTQ+ independent archives and GLAMU institutions. My study has two research objectives. The first is to investigate what GLAMU institutions have put in place over time to document LGBTQ+ and the subsequent effects on LGBTQ+ independent archiving. The second is to explore the nature of the relationships between LGBTQ+ independent archives, LGBTQ+ donors and GLAMU institutions. These objectives will be investigated using a qualitative and interpretive approach that will draw on metamodern concepts to critically recognise injustice, inequality and exclusion. Several theoretical lenses will be applied: queer theory and affect theory around how collections are perceived, described and valued; ethics of care and radical empathy theories with respect to donor relationships.","PeriodicalId":53976,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association","volume":"72 1","pages":"306 - 307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2023.2212941","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

LGBTQ+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer) activism has played a significant role in effecting legislative and social change in New Zealand and internationally, promulgating public attitudinal shifts towards tolerance and inclusion. These societal changes do not however appear to have resulted in the visible representation of the LGBTQ+ communities in New Zealand’s galleries, libraries, archives, museums and universities (GLAMU), a phenomenon recognised elsewhere. American historian Jim Downs (2021, p. 31) stated that ‘LGBT people have been the leading and often exclusive archivists of their own history; beginning in the 1970s and continuing until today’. LGBTQ+ communities have been driven to establish their own independent archives to document and preserve their stories. The lack of GLAMU institutional recognition of LGBTQ+ communities explicitly in their collections and services has been noted within the information science field. Scholars have expressed consternation at the lack of representation and visibility of LGBTQ+ communities in GLAMU institutions and the omission of LGBTQ+ historical context (Chenier, 2010; McIntyre, 2007). LGBTQ+ communities should be recognised in cultural heritage documentation and accurately represented in national and local narratives. My research will explore what is occurring in the collecting, documenting, and donating space with respect to New Zealand LGBTQ+ communities, LGBTQ+ independent archives and GLAMU institutions. My study has two research objectives. The first is to investigate what GLAMU institutions have put in place over time to document LGBTQ+ and the subsequent effects on LGBTQ+ independent archiving. The second is to explore the nature of the relationships between LGBTQ+ independent archives, LGBTQ+ donors and GLAMU institutions. These objectives will be investigated using a qualitative and interpretive approach that will draw on metamodern concepts to critically recognise injustice, inequality and exclusion. Several theoretical lenses will be applied: queer theory and affect theory around how collections are perceived, described and valued; ethics of care and radical empathy theories with respect to donor relationships.
新西兰LGBTQ+社区、其独立档案和GLAMU部门的收集和联系经验的整体探索
LGBTQ+(女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿)运动在影响新西兰和国际上的立法和社会变革方面发挥了重要作用,促进了公众对宽容和包容的态度转变。然而,这些社会变化似乎并没有导致LGBTQ+社区在新西兰的画廊、图书馆、档案馆、博物馆和大学(GLAMU)中有明显的代表性,这种现象在其他地方得到了认可。美国历史学家吉姆·唐斯(Jim Downs, 2021年,第31页)指出,“LGBT人群一直是他们自己历史的主要存档者,而且往往是唯一的存档者;从20世纪70年代开始,一直持续到今天。LGBTQ+社区已经开始建立自己的独立档案来记录和保存他们的故事。信息科学领域已经注意到,GLAMU在馆藏和服务中缺乏对LGBTQ+社区的明确机构认可。学者们对GLAMU机构中LGBTQ+社区缺乏代表性和可见性以及LGBTQ+历史背景的遗漏表示震惊(Chenier, 2010;麦金太尔,2007)。LGBTQ+社区应该在文化遗产文件中得到认可,并在国家和地方叙事中得到准确体现。我的研究将探讨新西兰LGBTQ+社区、LGBTQ+独立档案馆和GLAMU机构在收集、记录和捐赠空间方面发生的事情。我的研究有两个研究目标。第一个是调查GLAMU机构长期以来为记录LGBTQ+所做的工作,以及随后对LGBTQ+独立存档的影响。二是探索LGBTQ+独立档案、LGBTQ+捐赠者和GLAMU机构之间关系的本质。这些目标将使用定性和解释性的方法进行调查,该方法将利用元现代概念来批判性地认识不公正、不平等和排斥。几个理论镜头将被应用:酷儿理论和影响理论,围绕如何感知,描述和价值收藏;关于捐赠者关系的关怀伦理和激进共情理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association
Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association is the flagship journal of the Australian Library and Information Association (ALIA). It is a quarterly publication for information science researchers, information professionals, related disciplines and industries. The Journal aims to stimulate discussion and inform practice by showcasing original peer reviewed research articles and other scholarly papers about, or relevant to, the Australian and Southern Asia Pacific regions. Authors from the full range of information professions and areas of scholarship are invited to contribute their work to the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信