Influence of ABO compatibility on haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplant

IF 0.2 Q4 TRANSPLANTATION
R. Sawant, S. Sen, Deepali Naker
{"title":"Influence of ABO compatibility on haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplant","authors":"R. Sawant, S. Sen, Deepali Naker","doi":"10.4103/ijot.ijot_134_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for hematologic malignancies. Nowadays, usually, haploidentical stem cell transplant is performed across the ABO blood group barrier; however, the effect of ABO incompatibility on haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is still uncertain. Methodology: Retrospective analysis of data of patients who underwent haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation at our hospital was performed. The patient cohort was classified in to two arms: ABO compatible and ABO-incompatible haploidentical stem cell transplantation. ABO-incompatible was further categorized as major mismatch, minor mismatch and bidirectional mismatch. The average follow-up period was 6 months posttransplant for which the following parameters were studied: (a) engraftment kinetics for white blood cell (WBC) and platelets, (b) graft rejection, (c) overall graft survival, (d) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and (e) clinical variation in outcome for patients receiving peripheral blood stem cell/bone marrow harvest (BMH) as the source of stem cells. Results: The median age of recipients for both ABO compatible and ABO incompatible was 24 years and most of them were parent-offspring transplants. A total of 39 patients underwent haploidentical stem cell transplantation during the study period. Our cohort consisted of 23 ABO-compatible patients and 17 ABO incompatible patients. Out of these 17, 6 were major mismatch, 11 were minor mismatch and none were bidirectional mismatch. Of these 39 patients, 82% (32/39) engrafted within the normal expected time frame. The average days to WBC and platelet engraftment in these subgroups were noted to be as follows: Major – 12 and 18 days, compatible – 9 and 17 days, and minor – 10 and 17 days, respectively. Graft failure was observed in 20% (8/39) of patients, of which 4 patients had undergone ABO-compatible transplants while 4 patients had undergone minor ABO incompatible transplants. In this study, we observed that major ABO incompatibility had severe risk of GVHD (17%) compared to compatible (39%) and minor (27%) blood group mismatch. The overall survival rate in 6 months was equal (70%) in both arms. 5/39 patients, i.e., 12% received BMH as the source of stem cells, of these 80% are alive. Conclusion: Haploidentical transplants done in patients with ABO-incompatible donors had outcomes comparable to the ABO-compatible group. The risk of severe GVHD did not increased in the ABO mismatch group. Recipient of BMH had a marginally better graft survival.","PeriodicalId":37455,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Transplantation","volume":"17 1","pages":"181 - 184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijot.ijot_134_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for hematologic malignancies. Nowadays, usually, haploidentical stem cell transplant is performed across the ABO blood group barrier; however, the effect of ABO incompatibility on haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is still uncertain. Methodology: Retrospective analysis of data of patients who underwent haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation at our hospital was performed. The patient cohort was classified in to two arms: ABO compatible and ABO-incompatible haploidentical stem cell transplantation. ABO-incompatible was further categorized as major mismatch, minor mismatch and bidirectional mismatch. The average follow-up period was 6 months posttransplant for which the following parameters were studied: (a) engraftment kinetics for white blood cell (WBC) and platelets, (b) graft rejection, (c) overall graft survival, (d) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and (e) clinical variation in outcome for patients receiving peripheral blood stem cell/bone marrow harvest (BMH) as the source of stem cells. Results: The median age of recipients for both ABO compatible and ABO incompatible was 24 years and most of them were parent-offspring transplants. A total of 39 patients underwent haploidentical stem cell transplantation during the study period. Our cohort consisted of 23 ABO-compatible patients and 17 ABO incompatible patients. Out of these 17, 6 were major mismatch, 11 were minor mismatch and none were bidirectional mismatch. Of these 39 patients, 82% (32/39) engrafted within the normal expected time frame. The average days to WBC and platelet engraftment in these subgroups were noted to be as follows: Major – 12 and 18 days, compatible – 9 and 17 days, and minor – 10 and 17 days, respectively. Graft failure was observed in 20% (8/39) of patients, of which 4 patients had undergone ABO-compatible transplants while 4 patients had undergone minor ABO incompatible transplants. In this study, we observed that major ABO incompatibility had severe risk of GVHD (17%) compared to compatible (39%) and minor (27%) blood group mismatch. The overall survival rate in 6 months was equal (70%) in both arms. 5/39 patients, i.e., 12% received BMH as the source of stem cells, of these 80% are alive. Conclusion: Haploidentical transplants done in patients with ABO-incompatible donors had outcomes comparable to the ABO-compatible group. The risk of severe GVHD did not increased in the ABO mismatch group. Recipient of BMH had a marginally better graft survival.
ABO相容性对单倍体造血干细胞移植的影响
同种异体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)是治疗恶性血液病的唯一方法。目前,单倍体干细胞移植通常是跨越ABO血型屏障进行的;然而,ABO血型不相容对单倍体造血干细胞移植的影响尚不明确。方法:回顾性分析我院单倍体造血干细胞移植患者的资料。患者队列分为两组:ABO相容和ABO不相容单倍体干细胞移植。abo -不相容进一步分为大错配、小错配和双向错配。平均随访时间为移植后6个月,其中研究了以下参数:(a)白细胞(WBC)和血小板的移植动力学,(b)移植物排斥反应,(c)移植物总体存活,(d)移植物抗宿主病(GVHD),以及(e)接受外周血干细胞/骨髓收获(BMH)作为干细胞来源的患者结局的临床变化。结果:ABO相容和ABO不相容的受者中位年龄均为24岁,以亲子移植为主。在研究期间,共有39例患者接受了单倍体干细胞移植。我们的队列包括23例ABO相容患者和17例ABO不相容患者。其中,大错配6例,小错配11例,无双向错配。在这39例患者中,82%(32/39)在正常预期时间内移植。这些亚组到白细胞和血小板植入的平均时间如下:主要- 12和18天,相容- 9和17天,次要- 10和17天。20%(8/39)的患者出现了移植失败,其中4例患者进行了ABO相容移植,4例患者进行了轻微ABO不相容移植。在这项研究中,我们观察到,与血型匹配(39%)和轻微血型不匹配(27%)相比,ABO血型不匹配有严重的GVHD风险(17%)。两组患者6个月总生存率相同(70%)。5/39例患者,即12%接受BMH作为干细胞来源,其中80%存活。结论:单倍体移植在abo血型不相容的患者中,其结果与abo血型相容组相当。ABO血型不匹配组发生严重GVHD的风险没有增加。BMH受体的移植物存活率略高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Transplantation
Indian Journal of Transplantation Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Transplantation, an official publication of Indian Society of Organ Transplantation (ISOT), is a peer-reviewed print + online quarterly national journal. The journal''s full text is available online at http://www.ijtonline.in. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. It has many articles which include original articIes, review articles, case reports etc and is very popular among the nephrologists, urologists and transplant surgeons alike. It has a very wide circulation among all the nephrologists, urologists, transplant surgeons and physicians iinvolved in kidney, heart, liver, lungs and pancreas transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信