Evaluating nitrogen cycling in terrestrial biosphere models: a disconnect between the carbon and nitrogen cycles

S. Kou‐Giesbrecht, V. Arora, C. Seiler, A. Arneth, Stefanie Falk, Atul K. Jain, F. Joos, D. Kennedy, Jürgen Knauer, S. Sitch, M. O’Sullivan, Naiqing Pan, Qing Sun, H. Tian, N. Vuichard, S. Zaehle
{"title":"Evaluating nitrogen cycling in terrestrial biosphere models: a disconnect between the carbon and nitrogen cycles","authors":"S. Kou‐Giesbrecht, V. Arora, C. Seiler, A. Arneth, Stefanie Falk, Atul K. Jain, F. Joos, D. Kennedy, Jürgen Knauer, S. Sitch, M. O’Sullivan, Naiqing Pan, Qing Sun, H. Tian, N. Vuichard, S. Zaehle","doi":"10.5194/esd-14-767-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Terrestrial carbon (C) sequestration is limited by nitrogen (N), an\nempirically established constraint that could intensify under CO2\nfertilization and future global change. The terrestrial C sink is estimated\nto currently sequester approximately a third of annual anthropogenic\nCO2 emissions based on an ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models,\nwhich have been evaluated in their ability to reproduce observations of the\nC, water, and energy cycles. However, their ability to reproduce\nobservations of N cycling and thus the regulation of terrestrial C\nsequestration by N have been largely unexplored. Here, we evaluate an\nensemble of terrestrial biosphere models with coupled C–N cycling and their\nperformance at simulating N cycling, outlining a framework for evaluating N\ncycling that can be applied across terrestrial biosphere models. We find\nthat models exhibit significant variability across N pools and fluxes,\nsimulating different magnitudes and trends over the historical period,\ndespite their ability to generally reproduce the historical terrestrial C\nsink. Furthermore, there are no significant correlations between model\nperformance in simulating N cycling and model performance in simulating C\ncycling, nor are there significant differences in model performance between\nmodels with different representations of fundamental N cycling processes.\nThis suggests that the underlying N processes that regulate terrestrial C\nsequestration operate differently across models and appear to be\ndisconnected from C cycling. Models tend to overestimate tropical biological\nN fixation, vegetation C : N ratio, and soil C : N ratio but underestimate\ntemperate biological N fixation relative to observations. However, there is\nsignificant uncertainty associated with measurements of N cycling processes\ngiven their scarcity (especially relative to those of C cycling processes)\nand their high spatiotemporal variability. Overall, our results suggest that\nterrestrial biosphere models that represent coupled C–N cycling could be\noverestimating C storage per unit N, which could lead to biases in\nprojections of the future terrestrial C sink under CO2 fertilization\nand future global change (let alone those without a representation of N\ncycling). More extensive observations of N cycling processes and comparisons\nagainst experimental manipulations are crucial to evaluate N cycling and its\nimpact on C cycling and guide its development in terrestrial\nbiosphere models.\n","PeriodicalId":92775,"journal":{"name":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-767-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. Terrestrial carbon (C) sequestration is limited by nitrogen (N), an empirically established constraint that could intensify under CO2 fertilization and future global change. The terrestrial C sink is estimated to currently sequester approximately a third of annual anthropogenic CO2 emissions based on an ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models, which have been evaluated in their ability to reproduce observations of the C, water, and energy cycles. However, their ability to reproduce observations of N cycling and thus the regulation of terrestrial C sequestration by N have been largely unexplored. Here, we evaluate an ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models with coupled C–N cycling and their performance at simulating N cycling, outlining a framework for evaluating N cycling that can be applied across terrestrial biosphere models. We find that models exhibit significant variability across N pools and fluxes, simulating different magnitudes and trends over the historical period, despite their ability to generally reproduce the historical terrestrial C sink. Furthermore, there are no significant correlations between model performance in simulating N cycling and model performance in simulating C cycling, nor are there significant differences in model performance between models with different representations of fundamental N cycling processes. This suggests that the underlying N processes that regulate terrestrial C sequestration operate differently across models and appear to be disconnected from C cycling. Models tend to overestimate tropical biological N fixation, vegetation C : N ratio, and soil C : N ratio but underestimate temperate biological N fixation relative to observations. However, there is significant uncertainty associated with measurements of N cycling processes given their scarcity (especially relative to those of C cycling processes) and their high spatiotemporal variability. Overall, our results suggest that terrestrial biosphere models that represent coupled C–N cycling could be overestimating C storage per unit N, which could lead to biases in projections of the future terrestrial C sink under CO2 fertilization and future global change (let alone those without a representation of N cycling). More extensive observations of N cycling processes and comparisons against experimental manipulations are crucial to evaluate N cycling and its impact on C cycling and guide its development in terrestrial biosphere models.
评估陆地生物圈模型中的氮循环:碳循环和氮循环之间的脱节
摘要陆地碳(C)固存受到氮(N)的限制,氮是一种在二氧化碳矿化和未来全球变化的情况下可能会加剧的既定约束。根据一系列陆地生物圈模型,估计陆地碳汇目前封存了约三分之一的年度人类成因二氧化碳排放量,这些模型已被评估为再现碳、水和能源循环观测结果的能力。然而,它们复制氮循环观测结果的能力,以及氮对陆地碳吸收的调节,在很大程度上尚未被探索。在这里,我们评估了一组具有耦合碳氮循环的陆地生物圈模型及其在模拟氮循环方面的性能,概述了一个可应用于陆地生物圈模型的评估氮循环的框架。我们发现,尽管模型能够普遍再现历史陆地Csink,但模型在氮库和通量方面表现出显著的可变性,模拟了历史时期的不同幅度和趋势。此外,模拟N循环的模型性能与模拟C循环的模型绩效之间没有显著相关性,具有不同基本N循环过程表示的模型之间的模型性能也没有显著差异。这表明,调节陆地碳封存的潜在N过程在不同模型中的运作方式不同,似乎与碳循环无关。模型往往高估了热带生物固氮、植被C : N比和土壤C : 氮比率,但相对于观测值低估了温度生物氮固定。然而,考虑到N循环过程的稀缺性(尤其是相对于C循环过程)及其高时空变异性,与N循环过程测量相关的不确定性很大。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,代表碳氮耦合循环的陆地生物圈模型可能高估了每单位氮的碳储存量,这可能导致在二氧化碳施肥和未来全球变化下对未来陆地碳库的预测存在偏差(更不用说那些没有代表氮循环的模型了)。对氮循环过程进行更广泛的观察和比较以及实验操作对于评估氮循环及其对碳循环的影响以及指导其在地球生物圈模型中的发展至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信