Effects of ceramic primers and post-silanization heat treatment on bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate-based ceramic

IF 1.68 Q2 Dentistry
Thaiane Rodrigues Aguiar, Wladimir Franco de Sá Barbosa, Marina Di Francescantonio, Marcelo Giannini
{"title":"Effects of ceramic primers and post-silanization heat treatment on bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate-based ceramic","authors":"Thaiane Rodrigues Aguiar,&nbsp;Wladimir Franco de Sá Barbosa,&nbsp;Marina Di Francescantonio,&nbsp;Marcelo Giannini","doi":"10.1186/s40563-016-0078-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluated the effect of different ceramic primers and heat treatment of silane coupling agents on bond strength of resin cement to glass ceramic. Five ceramic primers (Clearfil Ceramic Primer/CCP, MonoBond-S, ProSil, RelyX Ceramic Primer and Silano) and one conventional resin cement (RelyX ARC) were tested. Lithium disilicate-based ceramic plates were previously etched with hydrofluoric acid, except for CCP (n?=?10). All silane agents were applied to ceramics according to the manufacturer’s instructions and primed ceramics plates were heated (in oven at 100?°C for 1?min) or not before resin cement placement. Dual-cure resin cement was mixed and inserted in tubes (0.75?mm diameter?×?1?mm height) that were positioned over primed ceramic surfaces. Micro-shear testing was performed using a universal testing machine. Bond strength data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (5%). Ceramic primer heating did not improve the bond strength of the resin cement to lithium disilicate. Most of ceramic primers did not indicate significant difference in bond strength among them; however, CCP yielded the lowest bond strength among the ceramic primers. In conclusion, when the silane was applied on etched surface the bond strength was higher and heat treatment of silane coupling agents did not affect the bond strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":464,"journal":{"name":"Applied Adhesion Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6800,"publicationDate":"2016-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-016-0078-0","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Adhesion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-016-0078-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of different ceramic primers and heat treatment of silane coupling agents on bond strength of resin cement to glass ceramic. Five ceramic primers (Clearfil Ceramic Primer/CCP, MonoBond-S, ProSil, RelyX Ceramic Primer and Silano) and one conventional resin cement (RelyX ARC) were tested. Lithium disilicate-based ceramic plates were previously etched with hydrofluoric acid, except for CCP (n?=?10). All silane agents were applied to ceramics according to the manufacturer’s instructions and primed ceramics plates were heated (in oven at 100?°C for 1?min) or not before resin cement placement. Dual-cure resin cement was mixed and inserted in tubes (0.75?mm diameter?×?1?mm height) that were positioned over primed ceramic surfaces. Micro-shear testing was performed using a universal testing machine. Bond strength data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (5%). Ceramic primer heating did not improve the bond strength of the resin cement to lithium disilicate. Most of ceramic primers did not indicate significant difference in bond strength among them; however, CCP yielded the lowest bond strength among the ceramic primers. In conclusion, when the silane was applied on etched surface the bond strength was higher and heat treatment of silane coupling agents did not affect the bond strength.

Abstract Image

陶瓷底漆及硅化后热处理对树脂水泥与二硅酸锂基陶瓷粘结强度的影响
本研究考察了不同陶瓷底漆和硅烷偶联剂热处理对树脂水泥与玻璃陶瓷粘结强度的影响。测试了五种陶瓷底漆(Clearfil ceramic Primer/CCP、MonoBond-S、ProSil、RelyX ceramic Primer和Silano)和一种常规树脂水泥(RelyX ARC)。除CCP (n?=?10)外,以前用氢氟酸蚀刻二硅酸锂基陶瓷板。所有硅烷剂都按照制造商的说明涂在陶瓷上,并将底漆陶瓷板加热(在100℃的烤箱中)。°C放置1分半钟)或不放置树脂水泥。双固化树脂水泥混合后插入管中(0.75?1毫米直径×? ?毫米高),放置在底漆陶瓷表面上。采用万能试验机进行微剪切试验。粘结强度数据采用双因素方差分析和Tukey检验(5%)进行分析。陶瓷底漆加热并没有提高树脂水泥与二硅酸锂的粘结强度。大部分陶瓷引物的结合强度差异不显著;然而,在陶瓷引物中,CCP的结合强度最低。综上所述,当硅烷应用于蚀刻表面时,结合强度更高,并且硅烷偶联剂的热处理不影响结合强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Adhesion Science
Applied Adhesion Science Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Adhesion Science focuses on practical applications of adhesives, with special emphasis in fields such as oil industry, aerospace and biomedicine. Topics related to the phenomena of adhesion and the application of adhesive materials are welcome, especially in biomedical areas such as adhesive dentistry. Both theoretical and experimental works are considered for publication. Applied Adhesion Science is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal''s open access policy offers a fast publication workflow whilst maintaining rigorous peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信