Individual and Community Level Factors Related to Sanitation, Water Quality, Treatment and Management in Rural Communities in Accra, Ghana: A Field Study Report

Angelique Willis, Mildred Addo, Lauren Yoder, Cassandra M Johnson, S. Resler, Leticia Young, Elizabeth Armstrong-Mensah
{"title":"Individual and Community Level Factors Related to Sanitation, Water Quality, Treatment and Management in Rural Communities in Accra, Ghana: A Field Study Report","authors":"Angelique Willis, Mildred Addo, Lauren Yoder, Cassandra M Johnson, S. Resler, Leticia Young, Elizabeth Armstrong-Mensah","doi":"10.21106/ijtmrph.395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Access to safe drinking water and adequate sanitation are basic necessities of life, yet not everyone in the world is able to access these services, particularly people living in rural areas. Rural areas in Ghana, defined as communities with populations less than 5,000 people, and some rural areas in the United States (US), defined as non-metropolitan communities, experience water and sanitation-related issues to varying degrees. The purpose of the field study was to examine individual and community level issues related to sanitation, and water sources, water quality, treatment and management, water needs and water-related illness in Accra, Ghana, and to determine areas of similarities and differences with the US. Thus, study results are not generalizable to the entire population of Ghana. Given the short duration of the entire field study (three weeks) and the fact that most information on water and sanitation in the US is publicly-available, secondary data from various sources were used for the US comparison. Results from the study showed that 61.4% of study participants in the selected communities in Accra and 80.0% of Americans living in rural areas had access to safe water. Lack of access to toilet facilities was minimal in rural communities in both Ghana and the US.\n \nCopyright © 2022 Willis et al. Published by Global Health and Education Projects, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0.","PeriodicalId":93768,"journal":{"name":"International journal of translational medical research and public health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of translational medical research and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21106/ijtmrph.395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Access to safe drinking water and adequate sanitation are basic necessities of life, yet not everyone in the world is able to access these services, particularly people living in rural areas. Rural areas in Ghana, defined as communities with populations less than 5,000 people, and some rural areas in the United States (US), defined as non-metropolitan communities, experience water and sanitation-related issues to varying degrees. The purpose of the field study was to examine individual and community level issues related to sanitation, and water sources, water quality, treatment and management, water needs and water-related illness in Accra, Ghana, and to determine areas of similarities and differences with the US. Thus, study results are not generalizable to the entire population of Ghana. Given the short duration of the entire field study (three weeks) and the fact that most information on water and sanitation in the US is publicly-available, secondary data from various sources were used for the US comparison. Results from the study showed that 61.4% of study participants in the selected communities in Accra and 80.0% of Americans living in rural areas had access to safe water. Lack of access to toilet facilities was minimal in rural communities in both Ghana and the US.   Copyright © 2022 Willis et al. Published by Global Health and Education Projects, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0.
加纳阿克拉农村社区与卫生、水质、处理和管理相关的个人和社区层面因素:一份实地研究报告
获得安全饮用水和适当的卫生设施是生活的基本必需品,但并不是世界上每个人都能获得这些服务,尤其是生活在农村地区的人。加纳的农村地区被定义为人口少于5000人的社区,而美国的一些农村地区则被定义为非大都市社区,在不同程度上遇到了与水和卫生有关的问题。实地研究的目的是审查加纳阿克拉与卫生、水源、水质、处理和管理、用水需求和与水有关的疾病有关的个人和社区层面的问题,并确定与美国的相似和不同之处。因此,研究结果无法推广到加纳的全体人口。鉴于整个实地研究的时间很短(三周),而且美国的大多数水和卫生信息都是公开的,因此美国的比较使用了来自各种来源的二次数据。研究结果显示,在阿克拉选定的社区中,61.4%的研究参与者和80.0%的生活在农村地区的美国人能够获得安全的水。在加纳和美国的农村社区,厕所设施的缺乏是最低的。版权所有©2022 Willis等人。由全球健康和教育项目,股份有限公司出版。这是一篇根据知识共享归因许可CC by 4.0条款分发的开放式文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信