Selectivity among educational migrants? A multi-sited investigation

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
H. Cebolla-Boado, Yasemin Nuhoglu Soysal
{"title":"Selectivity among educational migrants? A multi-sited investigation","authors":"H. Cebolla-Boado, Yasemin Nuhoglu Soysal","doi":"10.1080/21620555.2023.2249589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research on migration is shifting from comparisons between migrants and non-migrants in destination countries to a multi-sited origin-destination perspective, which allows us to address the issue of migrant selectivity. Selectivity implies that migration results from a systematic bias according to which emigrants differ from non-migrants in origin. The literature on selectivity has overlooked educational migrants, an important contributor to the flow of highly skilled international migration. We investigate whether international students in tertiary education replicate the pattern of positive selection that is systematically found among the general migrant population. Our paper compares leavers and stayers using social background and selected individuality traits to study this phenomenon. Using the first large-scale representative survey of Chinese students enrolled in tertiary education in China, Germany, and the UK, we provide two critical findings. Firstly, we find a pattern of hyper-selection by social background among Chinese students abroad compared with stayers at home, although international education is a more democratic phenomenon than is generally believed. Secondly, we find that selection in terms of “unobservable” individuality traits is rather modest.","PeriodicalId":51780,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Sociological Review","volume":"55 1","pages":"442 - 466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2023.2249589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Research on migration is shifting from comparisons between migrants and non-migrants in destination countries to a multi-sited origin-destination perspective, which allows us to address the issue of migrant selectivity. Selectivity implies that migration results from a systematic bias according to which emigrants differ from non-migrants in origin. The literature on selectivity has overlooked educational migrants, an important contributor to the flow of highly skilled international migration. We investigate whether international students in tertiary education replicate the pattern of positive selection that is systematically found among the general migrant population. Our paper compares leavers and stayers using social background and selected individuality traits to study this phenomenon. Using the first large-scale representative survey of Chinese students enrolled in tertiary education in China, Germany, and the UK, we provide two critical findings. Firstly, we find a pattern of hyper-selection by social background among Chinese students abroad compared with stayers at home, although international education is a more democratic phenomenon than is generally believed. Secondly, we find that selection in terms of “unobservable” individuality traits is rather modest.
教育移民的选择性?多地点调查
摘要对移民的研究正在从目的地国移民和非移民之间的比较转向多地点的原籍地视角,这使我们能够解决移民选择性问题。选择性意味着移民是一种系统性偏见的结果,根据这种偏见,移民在原籍上与非移民不同。关于选择性的文献忽视了受过教育的移民,这是高技能国际移民流动的一个重要因素。我们调查了接受高等教育的国际学生是否复制了在普通移民群体中系统发现的积极选择模式。本文利用社会背景和所选择的个性特征对离职者和留守者进行了比较,以研究这一现象。通过对在中国、德国和英国接受高等教育的中国学生进行的首次大规模代表性调查,我们提供了两个关键的发现。首先,我们发现,尽管国际教育是一种比人们普遍认为的更民主的现象,但与国内学生相比,在国外的中国学生中存在着社会背景的过度选择模式。其次,我们发现在“不可观察”的个性特征方面的选择是相当温和的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信