Appendix: Reviews of Sinologism in International Journals

Abstract

1. J. Hillis Miller, “Foreword” to Sinologism: An Alternative to Orientalism and Postcolonialism (London and New York: Routledge, 2013), pp. xiv–xix. 2. Jonathan Stalling, “Review of Sinologism: An Alternative to Orientalism and Postcolonialism,” Chinese Literature Today 3, no. 1/2 (2013): 177. 3. Martin J. Powers, “Review of Sinologism: An Alternative to Orientalism and Postcolonialism,” Journal of Asian Studies 73, no. 4 (2014). 4. Shaoling Ma, “Review for Sinologism: An Alternative to Orientalism and Postcolonialism,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 41, no. S1 (December 2014): 770–774. 5. Gang Zhou, “Review of Sinologism: An Alternative to Orientalism and Postcolonialism,” Journal of Modern Chinese Literature and Culture (February 2015). 6. T. H. Barrett, “Review of Sinologism: An Alternative to Orientalism and Postcolonialism,” The China Quarterly 222 (June 2015): 585–587. 7. Steven Burik, “Review of Sinologism: An Alternative to Orientalism and Postcolonialism,” Philosophy East and West 65, no. 3 (July 2015): 997–999. 8. Zhou Xian, “Reflections on Reading Ming Dong Gu’s Sinologism: An Alternative to Orientalism and Postcolonialism,” Philosophy East and West 65, no. 4 (October 2015): 1273–1279. 9. Weihua He, “Who Owns China? Review of Sinologism: An Alternative to Orientalism and Postcolonialism,” Postcolonial Studies 19, no. 1 (2016): 254–258. 10. Viatcheslav Vetrov, “China’s New School of Thought-Masters (Xinzixue): An Alternative to Sinologism?,” Asiatische Studien— Etudes Asiatiques 70, no. 3 (2016): 731–755.