Revisiting Women's Cinema: Feminism, Socialism, and Mainstream Culture in Modern China by Lingzhen Wang (review)

IF 0.5 Q1 HISTORY
Lin Li
{"title":"Revisiting Women's Cinema: Feminism, Socialism, and Mainstream Culture in Modern China by Lingzhen Wang (review)","authors":"Lin Li","doi":"10.1353/tcc.2023.a905563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the rich scholarship on socialist Chinese cinema, few scholars have examined it through a feminist lens. Through an in-depth study of four female directors and their films, Revisiting Women’s Cinema critically fills this lacuna by examining the shifting Chinese feminist and mainstream cultural practices during two periods: the Mao era (1949–1976) and the post-Mao era. The broader political and intellectual contexts that Revisiting Women’s Cinema engages with are China’s rapid integration into the world economy since the late 1970s, the dismissal of socialist feminism, and the global ascendence of Western liberal feminism. Influenced by liberal feminism’s emphasis on individualism and essential sexual difference, post-Mao Chinese feminism has long dismissed socialist women’s liberation as “imposed or bestowed from above by the party-state and men” (126) and works by female directors in Maoist China as mere propaganda. Arguing against the “global repudiation of socialist practice” (3), Revisiting Women’s Cinema reveals “the critical relevance of socialist institutionalized feminism and mainstream women’s cinema to contemporary feminist media practice” (4). Two concepts central to Lingzhen Wang’s analysis are “socialist feminism” (社会主义女性主义 shehuizhuyi nüxingzhuyi) and “mainstream culture” (主流文化 zhuliu wenhua). According to Wang, women’s liberation can only be achieved when other political-economic and sociocultural issues are taken seriously—an argument at the core of socialist feminism. Moreover, refuting post-Mao feminists’ dismissal of mainstream culture as “intrinsically conservative and patriarchal” (10), Wang holds that mainstream culture in Maoist China “played the most critical role in combatting traditional conservative ideas and bourgeois ideology and promoting socialist visions and ethics” (14). Together, these two terms constitute the main theoretical framework through which Wang examines Chinese women’s cinema. Organized chronologically, Revisiting Women’s Cinema consists of seven chapters. The first three chapters focus on the period of the 1950s and the 1960s, while the last four chapters examine the period from 1978 through the 1980s. Beyond its chronological ordering, Revisiting Women’s Cinema can be divided into two thematic sections: whereas chapters 1, 4, and 5 explain the changes in Chinese socialist mainstream culture in response to China’s political and economic transformations, chapters 2, 3, 6, and 7 each provide a detailed analysis of one Chinese female director and her films, revealing Chinese women’s crucial role in producing and diversifying mainstream culture. Chapter 1 provides a “revisionist history of Chinese socialist feminism” (17). Wang traces the widespread negative attitude toward Chinese socialist feminism to scholarship published in the United States in the 1980s. Using Judith Stacey’s Patriarchy and Socialist Revolution in China1 as an example, Wang offers a thorough critique of Stacey’s interpretation of feminism as primarily individualistic and the Chinese socialist revolution as","PeriodicalId":42116,"journal":{"name":"Twentieth-Century China","volume":"48 1","pages":"E-20 - E-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twentieth-Century China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tcc.2023.a905563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the rich scholarship on socialist Chinese cinema, few scholars have examined it through a feminist lens. Through an in-depth study of four female directors and their films, Revisiting Women’s Cinema critically fills this lacuna by examining the shifting Chinese feminist and mainstream cultural practices during two periods: the Mao era (1949–1976) and the post-Mao era. The broader political and intellectual contexts that Revisiting Women’s Cinema engages with are China’s rapid integration into the world economy since the late 1970s, the dismissal of socialist feminism, and the global ascendence of Western liberal feminism. Influenced by liberal feminism’s emphasis on individualism and essential sexual difference, post-Mao Chinese feminism has long dismissed socialist women’s liberation as “imposed or bestowed from above by the party-state and men” (126) and works by female directors in Maoist China as mere propaganda. Arguing against the “global repudiation of socialist practice” (3), Revisiting Women’s Cinema reveals “the critical relevance of socialist institutionalized feminism and mainstream women’s cinema to contemporary feminist media practice” (4). Two concepts central to Lingzhen Wang’s analysis are “socialist feminism” (社会主义女性主义 shehuizhuyi nüxingzhuyi) and “mainstream culture” (主流文化 zhuliu wenhua). According to Wang, women’s liberation can only be achieved when other political-economic and sociocultural issues are taken seriously—an argument at the core of socialist feminism. Moreover, refuting post-Mao feminists’ dismissal of mainstream culture as “intrinsically conservative and patriarchal” (10), Wang holds that mainstream culture in Maoist China “played the most critical role in combatting traditional conservative ideas and bourgeois ideology and promoting socialist visions and ethics” (14). Together, these two terms constitute the main theoretical framework through which Wang examines Chinese women’s cinema. Organized chronologically, Revisiting Women’s Cinema consists of seven chapters. The first three chapters focus on the period of the 1950s and the 1960s, while the last four chapters examine the period from 1978 through the 1980s. Beyond its chronological ordering, Revisiting Women’s Cinema can be divided into two thematic sections: whereas chapters 1, 4, and 5 explain the changes in Chinese socialist mainstream culture in response to China’s political and economic transformations, chapters 2, 3, 6, and 7 each provide a detailed analysis of one Chinese female director and her films, revealing Chinese women’s crucial role in producing and diversifying mainstream culture. Chapter 1 provides a “revisionist history of Chinese socialist feminism” (17). Wang traces the widespread negative attitude toward Chinese socialist feminism to scholarship published in the United States in the 1980s. Using Judith Stacey’s Patriarchy and Socialist Revolution in China1 as an example, Wang offers a thorough critique of Stacey’s interpretation of feminism as primarily individualistic and the Chinese socialist revolution as
《女性电影再探:中国现代的女权主义、社会主义与主流文化》王玲珍(综述)
尽管对中国社会主义电影有着丰富的学术研究,但很少有学者从女权主义的角度来研究它。通过对四位女性导演及其电影的深入研究,《重访女性电影》通过考察毛时代(1949–1976)和后毛时代两个时期中国女权主义和主流文化实践的转变,批判性地填补了这一空白。《重访女性电影》所涉及的更广泛的政治和知识背景是,自20世纪70年代末以来,中国迅速融入世界经济,社会主义女权主义被摒弃,西方自由主义女权主义在全球的崛起。受自由主义女权主义强调个人主义和本质性别差异的影响,后毛时代的中国女权主义长期以来一直将社会主义妇女解放视为“党、国家和男人从上面强加或给予的”(126),并将毛时代中国女导演的作品视为纯粹的宣传。《重温女性电影》反对“对社会主义实践的全球否定”(3),揭示了“社会主义制度化女权主义和主流女性电影与当代女权主义媒体实践的批判性关联”(4)。王分析的两个核心概念是“社会主义女权主义”(社会主义女性主义 谢惠珠与主流文化(主流文化 朱刘文华)。王认为,只有当其他政治、经济和社会文化问题得到认真对待时,妇女的解放才能实现——这是社会主义女权主义的核心论点。此外,王驳斥了后毛时代女权主义者对主流文化“本质上保守和父权”的否定(10),认为毛主义中国的主流文化“在对抗传统保守思想和资产阶级意识形态、促进社会主义愿景和伦理方面发挥了最关键的作用”(14)。这两个术语共同构成了王审视中国女性电影的主要理论框架。《重访女性电影》按时间顺序编排,共分七章。前三章侧重于20世纪50年代和60年代,而后四章则考察了1978年至80年代。除了时间顺序之外,《重访女性电影》可以分为两个主题部分:第一章、第四章和第五章解释了中国社会主义主流文化在中国政治和经济转型中的变化,第二章、第三章、第六章和第七章分别对一位中国女导演及其电影进行了详细分析,揭示了中国女性在主流文化产生和多样化中的重要作用。第一章为“中国社会主义女权主义修正主义史”(17)。王将对中国社会主义女权主义的普遍否定态度追溯到20世纪80年代在美国发表的学术论文。王以朱迪斯·斯泰西的《父权制与中国的社会主义革命》为例,对斯泰西对女权主义主要是个人主义和中国社会主义革命的解释进行了彻底的批判
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信