Assessing Safety Culture and its Relationship with Mental Load and Job Stress in the National Gas Company

P. Sepehr, M. Jabbari, Marzieh Erfani Fard, Sh. Rezapour, K. Samimi
{"title":"Assessing Safety Culture and its Relationship with Mental Load and Job Stress in the National Gas Company","authors":"P. Sepehr, M. Jabbari, Marzieh Erfani Fard, Sh. Rezapour, K. Samimi","doi":"10.18502/aoh.v5i4.7978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Accidents may occur for varying reasons, including unsafe behaviors, which originate from the safety culture of the organization. Job stress and mental load may also be contributory to accidents. This study aimed to assess safety culture and its relationship with mental load and job stress in a national gas company in Iran. \nMethods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted over a period of one year. This study used the NASA-TLX task load index, a standard questionnaire approved by the American National Institute of Mental Health to measure job stress, and the standard Health and Safety Executive safety culture questionnaire. All personnel was counted, and the total number of employees was 122. Statistical methods of t-test, correlation coefficient, and averaging have been used. Data were collected and analyzed in SPSS software and Microsoft Excel software. \n Results: The average mental load of employees was 61.51, i.e., moderate level. The average job stress and employee safety culture were 180.43, i.e., high level, and 331.34, i.e., desired level. The mental load was assessed as moderate, safety culture was optimal, and job stress was high. A significant relation was found between safety culture and mental load (correlation coefficient: -0.278; p = 0.03). Besides, the mental load was significantly related to job stress (correlation coefficient=0.293; p =  0.2). \nConclusion: Controlling stress and reducing the mental load in sensitive work environments is important and can lead to a higher level of safety culture in the organization.","PeriodicalId":32672,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Occupational Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/aoh.v5i4.7978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accidents may occur for varying reasons, including unsafe behaviors, which originate from the safety culture of the organization. Job stress and mental load may also be contributory to accidents. This study aimed to assess safety culture and its relationship with mental load and job stress in a national gas company in Iran. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted over a period of one year. This study used the NASA-TLX task load index, a standard questionnaire approved by the American National Institute of Mental Health to measure job stress, and the standard Health and Safety Executive safety culture questionnaire. All personnel was counted, and the total number of employees was 122. Statistical methods of t-test, correlation coefficient, and averaging have been used. Data were collected and analyzed in SPSS software and Microsoft Excel software. Results: The average mental load of employees was 61.51, i.e., moderate level. The average job stress and employee safety culture were 180.43, i.e., high level, and 331.34, i.e., desired level. The mental load was assessed as moderate, safety culture was optimal, and job stress was high. A significant relation was found between safety culture and mental load (correlation coefficient: -0.278; p = 0.03). Besides, the mental load was significantly related to job stress (correlation coefficient=0.293; p =  0.2). Conclusion: Controlling stress and reducing the mental load in sensitive work environments is important and can lead to a higher level of safety culture in the organization.
国家燃气公司安全文化评价及其与心理负荷和工作压力的关系
背景:事故的发生可能有多种原因,包括不安全行为,这些原因源于组织的安全文化。工作压力和精神负荷也可能导致事故。本研究旨在评估伊朗某国营天然气公司的安全文化及其与心理负荷和工作压力的关系。方法:这是一项为期一年的横断面研究。本研究采用NASA-TLX任务负荷指数、美国国家心理健康研究所认可的测量工作压力的标准问卷,以及健康与安全执行安全文化标准问卷。对所有人员进行统计,员工总数为122人。统计方法采用了t检验、相关系数、平均等。采用SPSS软件和Microsoft Excel软件进行数据收集和分析。结果:员工平均心理负荷为61.51,处于中等水平。工作压力和员工安全文化的平均水平分别为180.43和331.34,分别为高水平和理想水平。心理负荷为中等,安全文化为最佳,工作压力为高。安全文化与心理负荷存在显著相关(相关系数:-0.278;P = 0.03)。此外,心理负荷与工作压力显著相关(相关系数=0.293;P = 0.2)。结论:在敏感的工作环境中控制压力和减少心理负荷是很重要的,并且可以在组织中导致更高水平的安全文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信