Multimarket Contact and Capacity: Evidence from the US Airline Industry

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Su, L Dresner
{"title":"Multimarket Contact and Capacity: Evidence from the US Airline Industry","authors":"Su, L Dresner","doi":"10.5325/transportationj.60.3.0258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This study examines the relationship between multimarket contact (MMC) and competitive supply decisions by firms. Using US air-carrier traffic data, we find that a carrier's MMC is negatively associated with the available seats in a market. This finding provides support for the \"mutual forbearance hypothesis\" and suggests that MMC facilitates tacit collusion in the supply of capacity. We also find that tacit collusion may be more difficult to achieve on longer-distance routes, where carriers face difficulties monitoring the capacities of rivals that compete through indirect routings. On the longer-distance routes, the negative relationship between MMC and capacity thus diminishes. Finally, we show that the negative impact of MMC on capacity has increased in strength over the past 10 years. Since the impact of MMC on reducing capacity may lead to higher airfares, our findings contribute to important antitrust considerations.","PeriodicalId":46529,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Journal","volume":"60 1","pages":"258 - 306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.60.3.0258","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract:This study examines the relationship between multimarket contact (MMC) and competitive supply decisions by firms. Using US air-carrier traffic data, we find that a carrier's MMC is negatively associated with the available seats in a market. This finding provides support for the "mutual forbearance hypothesis" and suggests that MMC facilitates tacit collusion in the supply of capacity. We also find that tacit collusion may be more difficult to achieve on longer-distance routes, where carriers face difficulties monitoring the capacities of rivals that compete through indirect routings. On the longer-distance routes, the negative relationship between MMC and capacity thus diminishes. Finally, we show that the negative impact of MMC on capacity has increased in strength over the past 10 years. Since the impact of MMC on reducing capacity may lead to higher airfares, our findings contribute to important antitrust considerations.
多市场联系和能力:来自美国航空业的证据
摘要:本文研究了多市场接触与企业竞争性供给决策之间的关系。利用美国航空公司的交通数据,我们发现航空公司的MMC与市场上的可用座位呈负相关。这一发现为“相互容忍假说”提供了支持,表明MMC促进了产能供给的隐性串通。我们还发现,在长距离航线上,隐性串通可能更难实现,因为在长距离航线上,运营商难以监控通过间接航线竞争的对手的能力。在较长距离的线路上,MMC与运力之间的负相关关系减弱。最后,我们发现MMC对运力的负面影响在过去10年中有所增强。由于MMC对降低运力的影响可能导致更高的机票价格,我们的研究结果有助于重要的反垄断考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: Transportation Journal is devoted to the publication of articles that present new knowledge relating to all sectors of the supply chain/logistics/transportation field. These sectors include supply chain/logistics management strategies and techniques; carrier (transport firm) and contract logistics firm (3PL and 4PL) management strategies and techniques; transport economics; regulation, promotion, and other dimensions of public policy toward transport and logistics; and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信