Evaluation of the Digital Elevation Model from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) on the Papaloapan Macro-Basin, Mexico, using LiDAR as benchmark

IF 0.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
E. Uribe, José Cruz Escamilla, Abigail Juárez
{"title":"Evaluation of the Digital Elevation Model from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) on the Papaloapan Macro-Basin, Mexico, using LiDAR as benchmark","authors":"E. Uribe, José Cruz Escamilla, Abigail Juárez","doi":"10.24850/j-tyca-15-4-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Digital Elevation Model (DEM) from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) is evaluated using a LiDAR DEM from INEGI as benchmark in the Papaloapan Basin (~58,000km2) in Mexico. Three representative regions are selected: 1) a hilly region with strong slopes and elevations over 3,000m, 2) a transitional region with relatively smoother slopes and elevations around 1,000m, and 3) a floodplain with flat terrain and elevations below 100m. The straight comparison of both datasets shows very similar elevation values at the hilly and transitional regions. However, in the floodplain, the relationship has a parabolic shape, and errors are relatively higher, in terms of the elevation range. This is probably due to systematic errors in SRTM being very close to the actual low elevations. Maps of errors suggest strong association with water bodies and the aspect. For example, in the transitional region, most negative errors are found on slopes facing east, while positive errors are found on slopes facing west. Three-dimensional histograms of errors vs. topographic features (elevation, slope, and aspect) are estimated. The histograms suggest a systematic error, which means SRTM could be improved with a simple calibration at least in these cases. Evaluations of public DEMs from different sources in Mexico are considered necessary for the identification of their strengths and weaknesses. We believe these evaluations might provide the grounds for the creation of improved MEDs in the future either by either a simple calibration or through composite MEDs from multiple sources.","PeriodicalId":48977,"journal":{"name":"Tecnologia Y Ciencias Del Agua","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tecnologia Y Ciencias Del Agua","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24850/j-tyca-15-4-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Digital Elevation Model (DEM) from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) is evaluated using a LiDAR DEM from INEGI as benchmark in the Papaloapan Basin (~58,000km2) in Mexico. Three representative regions are selected: 1) a hilly region with strong slopes and elevations over 3,000m, 2) a transitional region with relatively smoother slopes and elevations around 1,000m, and 3) a floodplain with flat terrain and elevations below 100m. The straight comparison of both datasets shows very similar elevation values at the hilly and transitional regions. However, in the floodplain, the relationship has a parabolic shape, and errors are relatively higher, in terms of the elevation range. This is probably due to systematic errors in SRTM being very close to the actual low elevations. Maps of errors suggest strong association with water bodies and the aspect. For example, in the transitional region, most negative errors are found on slopes facing east, while positive errors are found on slopes facing west. Three-dimensional histograms of errors vs. topographic features (elevation, slope, and aspect) are estimated. The histograms suggest a systematic error, which means SRTM could be improved with a simple calibration at least in these cases. Evaluations of public DEMs from different sources in Mexico are considered necessary for the identification of their strengths and weaknesses. We believe these evaluations might provide the grounds for the creation of improved MEDs in the future either by either a simple calibration or through composite MEDs from multiple sources.
以激光雷达为基准,对墨西哥Papaloapan宏观盆地SRTM数字高程模型进行评估
航天飞机雷达地形任务(SRTM)的数字高程模型(DEM)是使用INEGI的LiDAR DEM作为墨西哥帕帕洛潘盆地(约58000km2)的基准进行评估的。选取了三个具有代表性的区域:1)坡度较大、海拔3000米以上的丘陵区;2)坡度相对平缓、海拔1000米左右的过渡区;3)地形平坦、海拔100米以下的泛滥平原。两个数据集的直接比较显示,丘陵和过渡地区的海拔值非常相似。然而,在泛滥平原,这种关系呈抛物线形,就高程范围而言,误差相对较高。这可能是由于SRTM中的系统误差非常接近实际的低海拔。误差图显示与水体和该方面有着密切的联系。例如,在过渡区,大多数负误差出现在朝东的斜坡上,而正误差出现在向西的斜坡上。对误差与地形特征(高程、坡度和方位)的三维直方图进行了估计。直方图表明存在系统误差,这意味着SRTM可以通过简单的校准来改进,至少在这些情况下是这样。对墨西哥不同来源的公共需求评估被认为是确定其优势和劣势的必要条件。我们相信,这些评估可能为未来通过简单校准或通过多个来源的复合MED创建改进的MED提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tecnologia Y Ciencias Del Agua
Tecnologia Y Ciencias Del Agua ENGINEERING, CIVIL-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published by the Mexican Institute of Water Technology, Water Technology and Sciences (Tecnología y ciencias del agua) is a highly specialized journal which reflects two important characteristics: The interdisciplinary nature of its articles and notes. The international scope of its authors, editors, reviewers, and readers. It constitutes the continuity of the journal Irrigación en México (Irrigation in Mexico) (1930-1946); Ingeniería hidráulica en México (Hydraulic Engineering in Mexico) (1947-1971); Recursos hidráulicos (Hydraulic Resources) (1972-1978), and Ingeniería hidráulica en México, second period (1985-2009). The journal is aimed at researchers, academics, and professionals who are interested in finding solutions to problems related to the water. The journal’s contents are interdisciplinary and contain previously unpublished articles and notes that offer original scientific and technological contribution that are developed in the fields of knowledge related to the following disciplines: Water and energy. Water quality. Hydro-agricultural sciences. Political and social science. Water management. Hydrology. Hydraulics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信