Physical Education Teachers’ Perceived Effectiveness in Association with Student Attendance, Teacher Adaptability, External Educational Supports, and Teaching Format During the COVID-19 Pandemic

A. Kuhn, Hannah R Thompson, Collin A Webster, C. Burgeson, J. Chriqui, Tevin Okutoyi, E. Hager
{"title":"Physical Education Teachers’ Perceived Effectiveness in Association with Student Attendance, Teacher Adaptability, External Educational Supports, and Teaching Format During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"A. Kuhn, Hannah R Thompson, Collin A Webster, C. Burgeson, J. Chriqui, Tevin Okutoyi, E. Hager","doi":"10.51250/jheal.v2i3.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spring 2020 pandemic-control policies included an abrupt shift to remote teaching, which may have affected physical education (PE) teachers’ perceived effectiveness. This study examined K-12 PE teachers’ perceived effectiveness in association with student attendance, teacher adaptability, PE supports, teaching format (in-person, remote synchronous, remote asynchronous, etc.), and teacher- and school-level demographics at three time points (pre-pandemic 2019–early 2020, Spring 2020, 2020–2021 school year). An electronic survey was developed by an expert panel and distributed to U.S. public school PE teachers (convenience sampling via school health-related organizations). For analyses, teacher perceived effectiveness was dichotomized (very/extremely effective= “1”; not at all/slightly/moderately effective= “0”). Logistic regression models assessed associations between perceived effectiveness and independent variables (student attendance, teacher adaptability, PE supports, teaching format, and demographic variables) at each time point. Respondents (n=134; M age=46) were mostly female (62%), general PE teachers (82%, versus adapted), had a graduate degree (66%), had >11 years of teaching experience (63%), and from 26 states. Perception of being very/extremely effective was highest pre-pandemic 2019–early 2020 (93%), lowest in Spring 2020 (12%), and recovered somewhat in 2020–2021 (45%). During the 2020–2021 school year, teachers had greater odds of perceiving they were more effective if they reported having higher student attendance (OR 1.06 [CI:1.02–1.09], p>.001) and higher adaptability (OR 1.22 [CI: 1.09–1.37], p>.001), adjusting for gender, education level, years of experience, grade level taught, and Title I status. Professional development opportunities are needed for remote teaching of PE to enhance teachers’ adaptability and perceived effectiveness during potential future school closures.","PeriodicalId":73774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthy eating and active living","volume":"2 1","pages":"97 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthy eating and active living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51250/jheal.v2i3.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spring 2020 pandemic-control policies included an abrupt shift to remote teaching, which may have affected physical education (PE) teachers’ perceived effectiveness. This study examined K-12 PE teachers’ perceived effectiveness in association with student attendance, teacher adaptability, PE supports, teaching format (in-person, remote synchronous, remote asynchronous, etc.), and teacher- and school-level demographics at three time points (pre-pandemic 2019–early 2020, Spring 2020, 2020–2021 school year). An electronic survey was developed by an expert panel and distributed to U.S. public school PE teachers (convenience sampling via school health-related organizations). For analyses, teacher perceived effectiveness was dichotomized (very/extremely effective= “1”; not at all/slightly/moderately effective= “0”). Logistic regression models assessed associations between perceived effectiveness and independent variables (student attendance, teacher adaptability, PE supports, teaching format, and demographic variables) at each time point. Respondents (n=134; M age=46) were mostly female (62%), general PE teachers (82%, versus adapted), had a graduate degree (66%), had >11 years of teaching experience (63%), and from 26 states. Perception of being very/extremely effective was highest pre-pandemic 2019–early 2020 (93%), lowest in Spring 2020 (12%), and recovered somewhat in 2020–2021 (45%). During the 2020–2021 school year, teachers had greater odds of perceiving they were more effective if they reported having higher student attendance (OR 1.06 [CI:1.02–1.09], p>.001) and higher adaptability (OR 1.22 [CI: 1.09–1.37], p>.001), adjusting for gender, education level, years of experience, grade level taught, and Title I status. Professional development opportunities are needed for remote teaching of PE to enhance teachers’ adaptability and perceived effectiveness during potential future school closures.
新冠肺炎大流行期间体育教师感知有效性与学生出勤率、教师适应性、外部教育支持和教学形式的关系
2020年春季疫情控制政策包括突然转向远程教学,这可能影响了体育教师的有效性。本研究在三个时间点(2019 - 2020年初、2020年春季、2020 - 2021学年)调查了K-12体育教师的感知有效性与学生出勤、教师适应性、体育支持、教学形式(面对面、远程同步、远程异步等)以及教师和学校层面的人口统计数据的关系。一个专家小组开发了一份电子调查,并分发给美国公立学校的体育教师(通过学校健康相关组织进行方便抽样)。为了进行分析,教师感知有效性被一分为二(非常/非常有效=“1”;完全没有/稍微有效/中等有效=“0”)。逻辑回归模型评估了每个时间点感知有效性与自变量(学生出勤率、教师适应性、体育支持、教学形式和人口变量)之间的关联。受访者(n = 134;M年龄=46岁),主要是女性(62%),普通体育教师(82%,与适应),拥有研究生学位(66%),有11年的教学经验(63%),来自26个州。对非常/极其有效的看法在2019 - 2020年初大流行前最高(93%),在2020年春季最低(12%),并在2020 - 2021年有所恢复(45%)。在2020-2021学年,如果教师报告有更高的学生出勤率(OR: 1.06 [CI: 1.02-1.09], p>.001)和更高的适应性(OR: 1.22 [CI: 1.09-1.37], p>.001),调整性别,教育水平,经验年数,教学年级水平和第一职称地位,他们认为自己更有效的几率更大。体育远程教学需要专业发展机会,以提高教师在未来可能的学校关闭期间的适应性和感知有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信