Postcolonial temporality of J. M. Coetzee’s Foe (1986)

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW

Law and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17521483.2022.2148369

Benjamin Goh

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article considers the temporality of J. M. Coetzee’s Foe (1986) for what it suggests about the demands of authorship and copyright in the postcolonial present. By close reading the novel alongside some salient commentaries and intertexts, we attend to the interval between the postcolonial novel and its early modern predecessor Robinson Crusoe (1719), and suggest how the works could be so reread as to displace the limits of proprietary authorship.

查看原文本刊更多论文

j·m·库切的《敌人》(1986)的后殖民时间性

本文考察库切(j.m. Coetzee)的《敌人》(Foe, 1986)的时间性，以揭示后殖民时代对作者身份和版权的要求。通过仔细阅读这部小说以及一些突出的评论和互文，我们关注了后殖民小说和它的早期现代前身《鲁滨逊漂流记》(1719)之间的间隔，并建议如何重读这些作品，以取代专有作者的限制。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Law and Humanities LAW-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Law and Humanities is a peer-reviewed journal, providing a forum for scholarly discourse within the arts and humanities around the subject of law. For this purpose, the arts and humanities disciplines are taken to include literature, history (including history of art), philosophy, theology, classics and the whole spectrum of performance and representational arts. The remit of the journal does not extend to consideration of the laws that regulate practical aspects of the arts and humanities (such as the law of intellectual property). Law and Humanities is principally concerned to engage with those aspects of human experience which are not empirically quantifiable or scientifically predictable. Each issue will carry four or five major articles of between 8,000 and 12,000 words each. The journal will also carry shorter papers (up to 4,000 words) sharing good practice in law and humanities education; reports of conferences; reviews of books, exhibitions, plays, concerts and other artistic publications.