Comparative Analysis of the Application of Multilayer and Convolutional Neural Networks for Recognition of Handwritten Letters of the Azerbaijani Alphabet

E. Mustafayev, Rustam Azimov
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Application of Multilayer and Convolutional Neural Networks for Recognition of Handwritten Letters of the Azerbaijani Alphabet","authors":"E. Mustafayev, Rustam Azimov","doi":"10.34229/2707-451x.21.3.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The implementation of information technologies in various spheres of public life dictates the creation of efficient and productive systems for entering information into computer systems. In such systems it is important to build an effective recognition module. At the moment, the most effective method for solving this problem is the use of artificial multilayer neural and convolutional networks. \nThe purpose of the paper. This paper is devoted to a comparative analysis of the recognition results of handwritten characters of the Azerbaijani alphabet using neural and convolutional neural networks. \nResults. The analysis of the dependence of the recognition results on the following parameters is carried out: the architecture of neural networks, the size of the training base, the choice of the subsampling algorithm, the use of the feature extraction algorithm. To increase the training sample, the image augmentation technique was used. Based on the real base of 14000 characters, the bases of 28000, 42000 and 72000 characters were formed. The description of the feature extraction algorithm is given.\nConclusions. Analysis of recognition results on the test sample showed:\nas expected, convolutional neural networks showed higher results than multilayer neural networks;\nthe classical convolutional network LeNet-5 showed the highest results among all types of neural networks. However, the multi-layer 3-layer network, which was input by the feature extraction results; showed rather high results comparable with convolutional networks;\nthere is no definite advantage in the choice of the method in the subsampling layer. The choice of the subsampling method (max-pooling or average-pooling) for a particular model can be selected experimentally;\nincreasing the training database for this task did not give a tangible improvement in recognition results for convolutional networks and networks with preliminary feature extraction. However, for networks learning without feature extraction, an increase in the size of the database led to a noticeable improvement in performance. Keywords: neural networks, feature extraction, OCR.","PeriodicalId":34598,"journal":{"name":"Kibernetika ta kompiuterni tekhnologiyi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kibernetika ta kompiuterni tekhnologiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34229/2707-451x.21.3.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction. The implementation of information technologies in various spheres of public life dictates the creation of efficient and productive systems for entering information into computer systems. In such systems it is important to build an effective recognition module. At the moment, the most effective method for solving this problem is the use of artificial multilayer neural and convolutional networks. The purpose of the paper. This paper is devoted to a comparative analysis of the recognition results of handwritten characters of the Azerbaijani alphabet using neural and convolutional neural networks. Results. The analysis of the dependence of the recognition results on the following parameters is carried out: the architecture of neural networks, the size of the training base, the choice of the subsampling algorithm, the use of the feature extraction algorithm. To increase the training sample, the image augmentation technique was used. Based on the real base of 14000 characters, the bases of 28000, 42000 and 72000 characters were formed. The description of the feature extraction algorithm is given. Conclusions. Analysis of recognition results on the test sample showed: as expected, convolutional neural networks showed higher results than multilayer neural networks; the classical convolutional network LeNet-5 showed the highest results among all types of neural networks. However, the multi-layer 3-layer network, which was input by the feature extraction results; showed rather high results comparable with convolutional networks; there is no definite advantage in the choice of the method in the subsampling layer. The choice of the subsampling method (max-pooling or average-pooling) for a particular model can be selected experimentally; increasing the training database for this task did not give a tangible improvement in recognition results for convolutional networks and networks with preliminary feature extraction. However, for networks learning without feature extraction, an increase in the size of the database led to a noticeable improvement in performance. Keywords: neural networks, feature extraction, OCR.
多层和卷积神经网络在阿塞拜疆字母手写体识别中的应用比较分析
介绍信息技术在公共生活的各个领域的应用要求建立有效和富有成效的系统,将信息输入计算机系统。在这样的系统中,建立一个有效的识别模块是很重要的。目前,解决这个问题最有效的方法是使用人工多层神经网络和卷积网络。论文的目的。本文致力于比较分析使用神经网络和卷积神经网络对阿塞拜疆字母表手写字符的识别结果。后果分析了识别结果对以下参数的依赖性:神经网络的结构、训练库的大小、子采样算法的选择、特征提取算法的使用。为了增加训练样本,使用了图像增强技术。在14000字的真实基数基础上,形成了28000、42000和72000字的基数。给出了特征提取算法的描述。结论。对测试样本的识别结果分析表明:不出所料,卷积神经网络比多层神经网络显示出更高的结果;经典卷积网络LeNet-5在所有类型的神经网络中显示出最高的结果。然而,多层3层网络,这是由特征提取结果输入的;显示出与卷积网络相当高的结果;在二次采样层中选择该方法没有明确的优势。可以通过实验选择特定模型的子采样方法(最大池化或平均池化);增加用于该任务的训练数据库并没有显著改善卷积网络和具有初步特征提取的网络的识别结果。然而,对于没有特征提取的网络学习,数据库大小的增加导致了性能的显著提高。关键词:神经网络,特征提取,OCR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书