下载PDF
{"title":"Isolation of High-Quality RNA from Pichia pastoris","authors":"Sibel Öztürk, İrem Demir, Pınar Çalık","doi":"10.1002/cpps.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Analysis of RNA structuromes provides new insights into cellular processes, enabling systems biology and biotechnology researchers to calculate promoter and terminator strengths and to directly observe how differing circuit states impact host gene expression and the burdens imposed by the circuits. Such analysis, however, is crucially dependent on the availability of highly pure, intact RNA isolated from fresh or frozen cell cultures. RNA extraction from the yeast <i>Pichia pastoris</i> requires specific pretreatment steps to ensure the reproducibility of downstream applications, but current methods and extraction kits are generally adapted for the conventional yeast <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>, which has a different cell wall composition. We therefore set out to compare the efficacy of two different RNA isolation methods when applied to <i>P. pastoris</i>: (i) phenol/chloroform extraction and (ii) silica spin-column absorption. We compared the yield, integrity, and purity of the resulting isolated RNA from the two methods (using two different types of commercial columns for silica spin-column absorption) and further optimized them through variations in the pretreatment steps. We also assessed two different methods of cell lysis: enzyme catalytic disruption using lyticase and mechanical disruption using acid-washed glass-beads in a TissueLyser. © 2019 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</p><p><b>Basic Protocol 1</b>: RNA isolation with phenol/chloroform extraction: monophasic lysis reagent</p><p><b>Alternate Protocol 1</b>: RNA isolation with silica-spin column absorption: High Pure RNA Isolation Kit (Roche Life Science)</p><p><b>Alternate Protocol 2</b>: RNA isolation with silica-spin column absorption: RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen)</p>","PeriodicalId":10866,"journal":{"name":"Current Protocols in Protein Science","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cpps.101","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Protocols in Protein Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpps.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Analysis of RNA structuromes provides new insights into cellular processes, enabling systems biology and biotechnology researchers to calculate promoter and terminator strengths and to directly observe how differing circuit states impact host gene expression and the burdens imposed by the circuits. Such analysis, however, is crucially dependent on the availability of highly pure, intact RNA isolated from fresh or frozen cell cultures. RNA extraction from the yeast Pichia pastoris requires specific pretreatment steps to ensure the reproducibility of downstream applications, but current methods and extraction kits are generally adapted for the conventional yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , which has a different cell wall composition. We therefore set out to compare the efficacy of two different RNA isolation methods when applied to P. pastoris : (i) phenol/chloroform extraction and (ii) silica spin-column absorption. We compared the yield, integrity, and purity of the resulting isolated RNA from the two methods (using two different types of commercial columns for silica spin-column absorption) and further optimized them through variations in the pretreatment steps. We also assessed two different methods of cell lysis: enzyme catalytic disruption using lyticase and mechanical disruption using acid-washed glass-beads in a TissueLyser. © 2019 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Basic Protocol 1 : RNA isolation with phenol/chloroform extraction: monophasic lysis reagent
Alternate Protocol 1 : RNA isolation with silica-spin column absorption: High Pure RNA Isolation Kit (Roche Life Science)
Alternate Protocol 2 : RNA isolation with silica-spin column absorption: RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen)
毕赤酵母高质量RNA的分离
RNA结构组的分析为细胞过程提供了新的见解,使系统生物学和生物技术研究人员能够计算启动子和终止子的强度,并直接观察不同的电路状态如何影响宿主基因表达和电路施加的负担。然而,这种分析至关重要地依赖于从新鲜或冷冻细胞培养物中分离出的高纯度、完整的RNA。从毕氏酵母中提取RNA需要特定的预处理步骤,以确保下游应用的可重复性,但目前的方法和提取试剂盒通常适用于具有不同细胞壁组成的传统酵母。因此,我们开始比较两种不同的RNA分离方法在应用于帕斯德酵母时的效果:(i)苯酚/氯仿提取和(ii)二氧化硅自旋柱吸收。我们比较了两种方法(使用两种不同类型的硅胶自旋柱吸收)所得RNA的收率、完整性和纯度,并通过预处理步骤的变化进一步优化了两种方法。我们还评估了两种不同的细胞裂解方法:使用裂解酶的酶催化裂解和在组织分析仪中使用酸洗玻璃珠的机械裂解。©2019 by John Wiley &基本方案1:用苯酚/氯仿萃取法分离RNA:单相裂解试剂替代方案1:用硅自旋柱吸收法分离RNA:高纯RNA分离试剂盒(罗氏生命科学公司)替代方案2:用硅自旋柱吸收法分离RNA: RNeasy Mini试剂盒(Qiagen公司)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。