Sound Subjects and Hearing Cultures: Towards an Acoustic Ethnography

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Ratheesh Kumar
{"title":"Sound Subjects and Hearing Cultures: Towards an Acoustic Ethnography","authors":"Ratheesh Kumar","doi":"10.1177/23210230221082831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sensory techniques enable the process of classification, which in turn facilitates the perceptive capacity to make sense of the world. The human competence to work with the senses in a complex and often unregistered manner prompts us to explore the world of the senses with reference to their functional modalities in the ways of knowing. Apparently, such an exploration cannot rest on the question of epistemology in its conventional frame. It rather involves the idea of the political in the making of a sensory hierarchy. The history of the sensory hierarchy is stridently audible through the early records of western modernity (Howes, 2003; Howes & Classen, 2014; Seremetakis, 1994; Stoller, 1989, 1997). Placing the hierarchy of the senses as a central concern, this article explores the promises of a sound ethnography that seeks to underline the ways of hearing as a methodological possibility, not as an alternate, but as an add-on to the hitherto ‘dominant’ visual sensibilities and practices. Is hearing an unexplored technique in the study of culture? Can hearing be a method in a more imaginative way in ethnographic research? How do we make sense of the relation between the listening ear and its ‘superior other’ the ‘observing eye’ in ethnographic contexts? While raising such methodological concerns is crucial to the shifting grounds of ethnography, the article engages with the recent debates in the emergent fields of sound studies, anthropology of the senses and digital ethnography.","PeriodicalId":42918,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Indian Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Indian Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23210230221082831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sensory techniques enable the process of classification, which in turn facilitates the perceptive capacity to make sense of the world. The human competence to work with the senses in a complex and often unregistered manner prompts us to explore the world of the senses with reference to their functional modalities in the ways of knowing. Apparently, such an exploration cannot rest on the question of epistemology in its conventional frame. It rather involves the idea of the political in the making of a sensory hierarchy. The history of the sensory hierarchy is stridently audible through the early records of western modernity (Howes, 2003; Howes & Classen, 2014; Seremetakis, 1994; Stoller, 1989, 1997). Placing the hierarchy of the senses as a central concern, this article explores the promises of a sound ethnography that seeks to underline the ways of hearing as a methodological possibility, not as an alternate, but as an add-on to the hitherto ‘dominant’ visual sensibilities and practices. Is hearing an unexplored technique in the study of culture? Can hearing be a method in a more imaginative way in ethnographic research? How do we make sense of the relation between the listening ear and its ‘superior other’ the ‘observing eye’ in ethnographic contexts? While raising such methodological concerns is crucial to the shifting grounds of ethnography, the article engages with the recent debates in the emergent fields of sound studies, anthropology of the senses and digital ethnography.
声音主体与听觉文化:走向声学民族志
感官技术使分类过程成为可能,分类过程反过来又促进了对世界的感知能力。人类以一种复杂的、常常是无意识的方式处理感官的能力,促使我们以认识的方式,参照它们的功能模式来探索感官的世界。显然,这种探索不能停留在传统框架下的认识论问题上。相反,它涉及到政治观念在感官等级的形成过程中。感官等级的历史在西方现代性的早期记录中清晰可见(Howes, 2003;Howes & Classen, 2014;Seremetakis, 1994;斯托勒,1989,1997)。将感官的层次结构作为中心关注点,本文探索了声音民族志的承诺,它试图强调听觉的方式作为一种方法论的可能性,而不是作为一种替代方法,而是作为迄今为止“占主导地位的”视觉感知和实践的补充。在文化研究中,听力是一种未被开发的技术吗?在民族志研究中,听觉是否可以成为一种更具想象力的方法?在民族志的语境中,我们如何理解倾听的耳朵和它的"优秀的他者" "观察的眼睛"之间的关系?虽然提出这样的方法论问题对民族志的转变至关重要,但本文涉及声音研究、感官人类学和数字民族志等新兴领域的最新辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Indian Politics
Studies in Indian Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: SIP will publish research writings that seek to explain different aspects of Indian politics. The Journal adopts a multi-method approach and will publish articles based on primary data in the qualitative and quantitative traditions, archival research, interpretation of texts and documents, and secondary data. The Journal will cover a wide variety of sub-fields in politics, such as political ideas and thought in India, political institutions and processes, Indian democracy and politics in a comparative perspective particularly with reference to the global South and South Asia, India in world affairs, and public policies. While such a scope will make it accessible to a large number of readers, keeping India at the centre of the focus will make it target-specific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信