Is Institutional Environment the Only Force Behind Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure? An Insight into Indian Companies

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
A. Bhatia, Megha Mahendru
{"title":"Is Institutional Environment the Only Force Behind Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure? An Insight into Indian Companies","authors":"A. Bhatia, Megha Mahendru","doi":"10.1177/0974686220923804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose: Companies Act, 2013, has brought a revolution in the regime of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in India, making it a mandatory practice for the corporate sector. The purpose of this article is to examine the impact of statutory provisions on the extent of CSR disclosure in India. Design/methodology/approach: This article considers an effective sample of 144 companies selected on the basis of average market capitalisation. The study relates to the year 2015–2016, which represents the time period when companies started reporting CSR issues mandatorily. CSR disclosure scores are calculated by using content analysis. Both univariate and multiple regression models are applied to check the effect of statutory provisions on CSR disclosure. Findings: The results indicate that variables namely NETWORTH, TURNOVER and DOMESTIC dummy have positive and statistically significant impact on CSR disclosure scores. However, TOBINSQ, representing profitability of companies, has negative and statistically significant impact on CSR disclosure scores, thus leading to anxious results. Research limitations/implications: Factors affecting CSR disclosure score have been selected on the basis of new statutory provisions introduced by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. Certain other vital attributes, especially related to corporate governance variables, too can be controlled for so that results have strong implications for companies. Practical implications: The empirical findings of this article implicate that institutional setup of a country has a strong bearing on the disclosure practices of the corporate sector. Thus, the authors strongly recommend to the statutory bodies that it is not sufficient just to make statutes but their implementation too should be ensured. Originality/value: With specific reference to India, mandating CSR disclosure is a recent law; so, the current study being first of its kind, would definitely add to the available literature and open gateways for future research.","PeriodicalId":37340,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Corporate Governance","volume":"13 1","pages":"34 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0974686220923804","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Corporate Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686220923804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Companies Act, 2013, has brought a revolution in the regime of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in India, making it a mandatory practice for the corporate sector. The purpose of this article is to examine the impact of statutory provisions on the extent of CSR disclosure in India. Design/methodology/approach: This article considers an effective sample of 144 companies selected on the basis of average market capitalisation. The study relates to the year 2015–2016, which represents the time period when companies started reporting CSR issues mandatorily. CSR disclosure scores are calculated by using content analysis. Both univariate and multiple regression models are applied to check the effect of statutory provisions on CSR disclosure. Findings: The results indicate that variables namely NETWORTH, TURNOVER and DOMESTIC dummy have positive and statistically significant impact on CSR disclosure scores. However, TOBINSQ, representing profitability of companies, has negative and statistically significant impact on CSR disclosure scores, thus leading to anxious results. Research limitations/implications: Factors affecting CSR disclosure score have been selected on the basis of new statutory provisions introduced by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. Certain other vital attributes, especially related to corporate governance variables, too can be controlled for so that results have strong implications for companies. Practical implications: The empirical findings of this article implicate that institutional setup of a country has a strong bearing on the disclosure practices of the corporate sector. Thus, the authors strongly recommend to the statutory bodies that it is not sufficient just to make statutes but their implementation too should be ensured. Originality/value: With specific reference to India, mandating CSR disclosure is a recent law; so, the current study being first of its kind, would definitely add to the available literature and open gateways for future research.
制度环境是企业社会责任披露的唯一推动力吗?对印度公司的洞察
目的:2013年《公司法》带来了印度企业社会责任(CSR)披露制度的革命,使其成为企业部门的强制性实践。本文的目的是研究法律规定对印度企业社会责任披露程度的影响。设计/方法/方法:本文考虑了144家公司在平均市值的基础上选择的有效样本。该研究涉及2015-2016年,这是公司开始强制报告企业社会责任问题的时间段。企业社会责任披露得分采用内容分析法计算。本文采用单变量回归模型和多元回归模型来检验法律规定对企业社会责任披露的影响。结果表明,NETWORTH、TURNOVER和DOMESTIC dummy对企业社会责任披露得分有显著的正向影响。然而,代表公司盈利能力的TOBINSQ对企业社会责任披露得分具有负向且具有统计学意义的显著影响,从而导致焦虑的结果。研究局限/启示:影响企业社会责任披露得分的因素是根据企业部新出台的法规规定选取的。某些其他重要属性,特别是与公司治理变量相关的属性,也可以加以控制,从而使结果对公司具有强烈的影响。实践启示:本文的实证结果表明,一个国家的制度设置对企业部门的信息披露行为有很强的影响。因此,作者向法定机构强烈建议,仅仅制定法规是不够的,还应确保其执行。原创性/价值:具体到印度,强制企业披露企业社会责任是最近颁布的法律;因此,目前的研究是同类研究中的第一个,肯定会增加现有的文献,并为未来的研究打开大门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Corporate Governance
Indian Journal of Corporate Governance Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Corporate Governance is a bi-annual refereed journal that provides a forum for discussions and exchanging views on a wide range of corporate governance issues ranging from board practices, independent directors, whistle blower policies and shareholder activism on one hand to media’s role in corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the other. It comprises of research articles, concept papers, case studies and reports providing a blend of theory and practices of corporate governance globally to cater to the interests of practitioners, academics, researchers and policy makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信