ANN-based methods for solving partial differential equations: a survey

Q1 Mathematics
D. A. Pratama, Maharani A. Bakar, N. B. Ismail, Mashuri M
{"title":"ANN-based methods for solving partial differential equations: a survey","authors":"D. A. Pratama, Maharani A. Bakar, N. B. Ismail, Mashuri M","doi":"10.1080/25765299.2022.2104224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Traditionally, partial differential equation (PDE) problems are solved numerically through a discretization process. Iterative methods are then used to determine the algebraic system generated by this process. Recently, scientists have emerged artificial neural networks (ANNs), which solve PDE problems without a discretization process. Therefore, in view of the interest in developing ANN in solving PDEs, scientists investigated the variations of ANN which perform better than the classical discretization approaches. In this study, we discussed three methods for solving PDEs effectively, namely Pydens, NeuroDiffEq and Nangs methods. Pydens is the modified Deep Galerkin method (DGM) on the part of the approximate functions of PDEs. Then, NeuroDiffEq is the ANN model based on the trial analytical solution (TAS). Lastly, Nangs is the ANN-based method which uses the grid points for the training data. We compared the numerical results by solving the PDEs in terms of the accuracy and efficiency of the three methods. The results showed that NeuroDiffeq and Nangs have better performance in solving high-dimensional PDEs than the Pydens, while Pydens is only suitable for low-dimensional problems.","PeriodicalId":37239,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25765299.2022.2104224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Traditionally, partial differential equation (PDE) problems are solved numerically through a discretization process. Iterative methods are then used to determine the algebraic system generated by this process. Recently, scientists have emerged artificial neural networks (ANNs), which solve PDE problems without a discretization process. Therefore, in view of the interest in developing ANN in solving PDEs, scientists investigated the variations of ANN which perform better than the classical discretization approaches. In this study, we discussed three methods for solving PDEs effectively, namely Pydens, NeuroDiffEq and Nangs methods. Pydens is the modified Deep Galerkin method (DGM) on the part of the approximate functions of PDEs. Then, NeuroDiffEq is the ANN model based on the trial analytical solution (TAS). Lastly, Nangs is the ANN-based method which uses the grid points for the training data. We compared the numerical results by solving the PDEs in terms of the accuracy and efficiency of the three methods. The results showed that NeuroDiffeq and Nangs have better performance in solving high-dimensional PDEs than the Pydens, while Pydens is only suitable for low-dimensional problems.
基于人工神经网络的偏微分方程求解方法综述
摘要传统上,偏微分方程(PDE)问题是通过离散化过程进行数值求解的。然后使用迭代方法来确定由该过程生成的代数系统。最近,科学家们出现了人工神经网络(Ann),它可以在没有离散化过程的情况下解决PDE问题。因此,鉴于在求解偏微分方程中开发人工神经网络的兴趣,科学家们研究了比经典离散化方法表现更好的人工神经网络变体。在本研究中,我们讨论了三种有效解决偏微分方程的方法,即Pydens方法、NeuroDiffEq方法和Nangs方法。Pydens是对偏微分方程近似函数部分的改进的Deep-Galerkin方法(DGM)。然后,NeuroDiffEq是基于试验分析解(TAS)的ANN模型。最后,Nangs是一种基于神经网络的方法,它使用网格点作为训练数据。我们从精度和效率的角度比较了求解偏微分方程的数值结果。结果表明,NeuroDiffeq和Nangs在求解高维偏微分方程方面比Pydens具有更好的性能,而Pydens仅适用于低维问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences
Arab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences Mathematics-Mathematics (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信