Regenerative Limb Salvage: A Novel Technique for Soft Tissue Reconstruction of Pediatric Extremities

Fouad Saeg, Elvira Chiccarelli, H. Hilaire, F. Lau
{"title":"Regenerative Limb Salvage: A Novel Technique for Soft Tissue Reconstruction of Pediatric Extremities","authors":"Fouad Saeg, Elvira Chiccarelli, H. Hilaire, F. Lau","doi":"10.1055/s-0040-1718420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background In complex extremity wounds, free flap-based limb salvage (fLS) is the standard of care. However, fLS is resource- and cost-intensive, and the limited availability of pediatric microsurgical expertise exacerbates these challenges. Regenerative LS (rLS) addresses these barriers to care. The aim of this study was to quantify the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of rLS in complex pediatric extremity wounds. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pediatric LS at a single hospital. Subjects were treated with fLS or rLS based on surgeon preference. Primary outcome measures were: definitive wound closure rates and time, rates of return to ambulation, number and length of procedures to achieve definitive closure, and rates of perioperative complications. Statistical analyses were performed utilizing the Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney U test with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results Over a 2-year period, nine consecutive patients presented with complex extremity wounds requiring fLS (n = 4) or rLS (n = 5). Demographics and wound characteristics were similar between groups. Compared with fLS, the rLS group achieved definitive wound closure 85.8% more quickly (13.8 vs. 97.5 days, p < 0.02), required 64.5% less operative time (132.6 vs. 373.0 minutes, p < 0.02), had fewer perioperative complications (0 vs. 5), and required fewer intensive care unit stays (0 vs. 1.3 days). Conclusion These data indicate that rLS is a safe and efficacious option in pediatric patients requiring soft tissue reconstruction for LS. Use of this novel technique can restore the reconstructive ladder, thereby expand patient access to pediatric LS while minimizing morbidity and reducing LS-related resource utilization.","PeriodicalId":34024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open","volume":"05 1","pages":"e82 - e89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0040-1718420","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background In complex extremity wounds, free flap-based limb salvage (fLS) is the standard of care. However, fLS is resource- and cost-intensive, and the limited availability of pediatric microsurgical expertise exacerbates these challenges. Regenerative LS (rLS) addresses these barriers to care. The aim of this study was to quantify the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of rLS in complex pediatric extremity wounds. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pediatric LS at a single hospital. Subjects were treated with fLS or rLS based on surgeon preference. Primary outcome measures were: definitive wound closure rates and time, rates of return to ambulation, number and length of procedures to achieve definitive closure, and rates of perioperative complications. Statistical analyses were performed utilizing the Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney U test with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results Over a 2-year period, nine consecutive patients presented with complex extremity wounds requiring fLS (n = 4) or rLS (n = 5). Demographics and wound characteristics were similar between groups. Compared with fLS, the rLS group achieved definitive wound closure 85.8% more quickly (13.8 vs. 97.5 days, p < 0.02), required 64.5% less operative time (132.6 vs. 373.0 minutes, p < 0.02), had fewer perioperative complications (0 vs. 5), and required fewer intensive care unit stays (0 vs. 1.3 days). Conclusion These data indicate that rLS is a safe and efficacious option in pediatric patients requiring soft tissue reconstruction for LS. Use of this novel technique can restore the reconstructive ladder, thereby expand patient access to pediatric LS while minimizing morbidity and reducing LS-related resource utilization.
再生肢体修复:一种用于儿童四肢软组织重建的新技术
摘要背景 在复杂的肢体创伤中,基于游离皮瓣的肢体挽救(fLS)是护理的标准。然而,fLS是资源和成本密集型的,儿科显微外科专业知识的有限可用性加剧了这些挑战。再生LS(rLS)解决了这些护理障碍。本研究的目的是量化rLS治疗复杂儿童四肢创伤的疗效、安全性和成本效益。方法 我们在一家医院对儿科LS进行了回顾性队列研究。受试者根据外科医生的偏好接受fLS或rLS治疗。主要的结果指标是:最终的伤口闭合率和时间、恢复行走的比率、达到最终闭合的手术次数和长度,以及围手术期并发症的发生率。利用Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析,统计显著性设置为p < 0.05%结果 在2年的时间里,连续9名患者出现复杂的四肢创伤,需要fLS(n = 4) 或rLS(n = 5) 。各组之间的人口学和伤口特征相似。与fLS相比,rLS组最终伤口闭合的速度快85.8%(13.8天对97.5天,p < 0.02),所需手术时间减少64.5%(132.6 vs.373.0 分钟,p < 0.02),围手术期并发症较少(0比5),需要较少的重症监护室住院时间(0比1.3天)。结论 这些数据表明,对于需要软组织重建LS的儿科患者来说,rLS是一种安全有效的选择。使用这种新技术可以恢复重建阶梯,从而扩大患者获得儿科LS的机会,同时最大限度地降低发病率并降低LS相关资源的利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信