Comparative study on sentimental analysis using machine learning techniques

IF 0.6 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Murali Krishna Enduri, A. Sangi, Satish Anamalamudi, Ramanadham Chandu Badrinath Manikanta, Kallam Yogeshvar Reddy, Panchumarthi Lovely Yeswanth, Suda Kiran Sai Reddy, Gogineni Asish Karthikeya
{"title":"Comparative study on sentimental analysis using machine learning techniques","authors":"Murali Krishna Enduri, A. Sangi, Satish Anamalamudi, Ramanadham Chandu Badrinath Manikanta, Kallam Yogeshvar Reddy, Panchumarthi Lovely Yeswanth, Suda Kiran Sai Reddy, Gogineni Asish Karthikeya","doi":"10.22581/muet1982.2301.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advancement of the Internet and the world wide web (WWW), it is observed that there is an exponential growth of data and information across the internet. In addition, there is a huge growth in digital or textual data generation. This is because users post the reply comments in social media websites based on the experiences about an event or product. Furthermore, people are interested to know whether the majority of potential buyers will have a positive or negative experience on the event or the product. This kind of classification in general can be attained through Sentiment Analysis which inputs unstructured text comments about the product reviews, events, etc., from all the reviews or comments posted by users. This further classifies the data into different categories namely positive, negative or neutral opinions. Sentiment analysis can be performed by different machine learning models like CNN, Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, XgBoost, Logistic Regression etc. The proposed work is compared with the existing solutions in terms of different performance metrics and XgBoost outperforms out of all other methods.","PeriodicalId":44836,"journal":{"name":"Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22581/muet1982.2301.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the advancement of the Internet and the world wide web (WWW), it is observed that there is an exponential growth of data and information across the internet. In addition, there is a huge growth in digital or textual data generation. This is because users post the reply comments in social media websites based on the experiences about an event or product. Furthermore, people are interested to know whether the majority of potential buyers will have a positive or negative experience on the event or the product. This kind of classification in general can be attained through Sentiment Analysis which inputs unstructured text comments about the product reviews, events, etc., from all the reviews or comments posted by users. This further classifies the data into different categories namely positive, negative or neutral opinions. Sentiment analysis can be performed by different machine learning models like CNN, Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, XgBoost, Logistic Regression etc. The proposed work is compared with the existing solutions in terms of different performance metrics and XgBoost outperforms out of all other methods.
使用机器学习技术进行情感分析的比较研究
随着互联网和万维网(WWW)的发展,互联网上的数据和信息呈指数级增长。此外,数字或文本数据的生成也有了巨大的增长。这是因为用户在社交媒体网站上根据对事件或产品的体验发布回复评论。此外,人们有兴趣知道大多数潜在买家对活动或产品的体验是积极的还是消极的。这种分类通常可以通过情感分析来实现,情感分析从用户发布的所有评论或评论中输入关于产品评论、事件等的非结构化文本评论。这进一步将数据分为不同的类别,即积极,消极或中立的意见。情感分析可以通过不同的机器学习模型来执行,比如CNN、朴素贝叶斯、决策树、XgBoost、逻辑回归等。根据不同的性能指标,将提出的工作与现有解决方案进行比较,XgBoost优于所有其他方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信