Acquisition of English Argument Patterns By Russian EFL Students

A. M. Amatov, A. Sedykh, T. Sidorova, E. E. Kotsova, E. Akimova, K. Skvortsov
{"title":"Acquisition of English Argument Patterns By Russian EFL Students","authors":"A. M. Amatov, A. Sedykh, T. Sidorova, E. E. Kotsova, E. Akimova, K. Skvortsov","doi":"10.20511/PYR2021.V9NSPE3.1180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Foreign (especially English) language learning has witnessed growing popularity in Russia over the last decades due to the enormous change in economic, political, legal, and cultural domains in the current period. The increasing need for good English speaking and writing skills put forward a demand for the accurate use of lexical items and grammatical structures by those who study English as a foreign language (EFL). Lexical and grammatical accuracy acquires a crucial importance in reasoning and argumentation. A slapdash word or syntactic construction in the argument structure may submit the listener to a conclusion, which is completely different from what the speaker implied. Such issues may be particularly frustrating in academic, legal, business, medical, and other types of institutional discourse. The rules of Aristotelian logic, underlying the good majority of reasoning structures, are generic. Therefore, it is a certain difference between the two languages, native (Russian) and foreign (English), that makes Russian students of English misinterprete logical chains and use irrelevant lexical items and grammatical constructions.","PeriodicalId":44235,"journal":{"name":"Propositos y Representaciones","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Propositos y Representaciones","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20511/PYR2021.V9NSPE3.1180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Foreign (especially English) language learning has witnessed growing popularity in Russia over the last decades due to the enormous change in economic, political, legal, and cultural domains in the current period. The increasing need for good English speaking and writing skills put forward a demand for the accurate use of lexical items and grammatical structures by those who study English as a foreign language (EFL). Lexical and grammatical accuracy acquires a crucial importance in reasoning and argumentation. A slapdash word or syntactic construction in the argument structure may submit the listener to a conclusion, which is completely different from what the speaker implied. Such issues may be particularly frustrating in academic, legal, business, medical, and other types of institutional discourse. The rules of Aristotelian logic, underlying the good majority of reasoning structures, are generic. Therefore, it is a certain difference between the two languages, native (Russian) and foreign (English), that makes Russian students of English misinterprete logical chains and use irrelevant lexical items and grammatical constructions.
俄罗斯英语学生英语论证模式的习得
在过去的几十年里,由于经济、政治、法律和文化领域的巨大变化,外语(尤其是英语)学习在俄罗斯越来越受欢迎。对良好的英语口语和写作技能的需求日益增长,这就要求英语学习者准确地使用词汇和语法结构。词汇和语法的准确性在推理和论证中至关重要。论点结构中一个草率的词或句法结构可能会使听者得出一个与说话者所暗示的完全不同的结论。这些问题在学术、法律、商业、医疗和其他类型的机构话语中尤其令人沮丧。亚里士多德逻辑的规则,是大多数推理结构的基础,是通用的。因此,正是母语(俄语)和外语(英语)这两种语言之间的某种差异,使得学英语的俄罗斯学生误解了逻辑链,使用了不相关的词汇项目和语法结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Propositos y Representaciones
Propositos y Representaciones PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信